Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Objectives: Globally, breast cancer is the second most frequently diagnosed malignancy just behind lung cancer, accounting for over 2 million cases each year. It is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide and the most common malignancy among females in India. The role of whole-body positron emission tomography (WBPET) in all cases of breast cancer is still not clear. This pilot study was undertaken to study whether there is any change in the management of breast cancer using WBPET scan in all patients of breast cancer irrespective of the stage? Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 43 patients with invasive breast cancer who were newly diagnosed at Malignant Disease Treatment Centre at a tertiary care centre in East India. The duration of the study was between June 2020 and March 2021. Patients underwent liver function test, mammography, breast ultrasound, bone scan, and tru-cut needle biopsy to confirm the presence of breast cancer and 18F-fluoro-Dglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) was studied in all 43 patients before the initiation of any therapy. The primary objective was to find out whether doing a WBPET upstaged the disease and changed our management. The secondary objective was to determine whether hormonal status (oestrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PR] and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [Her2] Neu) and Breast Imaging-Reporting and Database System (BIRADS) score staging had any correlation with metastasis. Results: A total of 43 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer were studied. The number of patients in Stage IIA (3/43), Stage IIB (4/43), Stage III A (17/43), Stage IIIB (13/43), and Stage IV was (6/33). Out of total 43 patients, in 10 (23%) patients, there was a change in treatment on doing an upfront WBPET scan. There was no correlation between ER, PR, or Her2 Neu positivity or negativity on the upstaging of the disease and change in treatment. Standardised uptake value (SUV) uptake of the primary lesion >7.2 was associated with upstaging and change of treatment. Conclusion: The use of 18F-FDG PET/CT has been shown to bring change in treatment in almost 20% of patients with breast cancer. Although the role of other variables in breast cancer such as hormone status, SUV of the primary lesion, and grade of lesion on BIRADS has also shown some association with change of treatment.
Objectives: Globally, breast cancer is the second most frequently diagnosed malignancy just behind lung cancer, accounting for over 2 million cases each year. It is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide and the most common malignancy among females in India. The role of whole-body positron emission tomography (WBPET) in all cases of breast cancer is still not clear. This pilot study was undertaken to study whether there is any change in the management of breast cancer using WBPET scan in all patients of breast cancer irrespective of the stage? Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 43 patients with invasive breast cancer who were newly diagnosed at Malignant Disease Treatment Centre at a tertiary care centre in East India. The duration of the study was between June 2020 and March 2021. Patients underwent liver function test, mammography, breast ultrasound, bone scan, and tru-cut needle biopsy to confirm the presence of breast cancer and 18F-fluoro-Dglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) was studied in all 43 patients before the initiation of any therapy. The primary objective was to find out whether doing a WBPET upstaged the disease and changed our management. The secondary objective was to determine whether hormonal status (oestrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PR] and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [Her2] Neu) and Breast Imaging-Reporting and Database System (BIRADS) score staging had any correlation with metastasis. Results: A total of 43 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer were studied. The number of patients in Stage IIA (3/43), Stage IIB (4/43), Stage III A (17/43), Stage IIIB (13/43), and Stage IV was (6/33). Out of total 43 patients, in 10 (23%) patients, there was a change in treatment on doing an upfront WBPET scan. There was no correlation between ER, PR, or Her2 Neu positivity or negativity on the upstaging of the disease and change in treatment. Standardised uptake value (SUV) uptake of the primary lesion >7.2 was associated with upstaging and change of treatment. Conclusion: The use of 18F-FDG PET/CT has been shown to bring change in treatment in almost 20% of patients with breast cancer. Although the role of other variables in breast cancer such as hormone status, SUV of the primary lesion, and grade of lesion on BIRADS has also shown some association with change of treatment.
Breast ultrasound is a primary diagnostic modality for evaluating suspected breast lesions. Histopathological examination of trucut biopsies helps in accurate typing and grading the tumor. In the present study we compared histopathological ndings of trucut breast biopsies with BIRADS score. It was a retrospective, 3 years study with 183 cases that had under gone ultrasound examination and trucut biopsy for histopathological examination. Among 183 cases, 8 were inconclusive, 93 were benign and 82 were malignant. In 183 cases, 62 cases were classied as BIRADS-II, 24 cases as BIRADS-III, 66 cases as BIRADS IV and 31 cases as BIRADS V. Sensitivity calculated was 98.78%, specicity was 86.02%, positive predictive value was 86.17% and negative predictive value was 98.77%. The disease prevalence was 46.86% and accuracy was 92%. P value was statistically signicant. Therefore, we conclude that BIRADS score is non-invasive and a useful test for evaluating breast lesions preoperatively. However, we cannot rely on BIRADS score in cases of sampling error, nature of the lesion or unusual radiological presentation that may lead to interpretation error and thus histopathology will be considered as gold standard in diagnosis of breast lumps.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.