2017
DOI: 10.1515/rjim-2016-0050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between Body Mass Index and abdominal circumference in Belgian adults: a cross-sectional study

Abstract: Introduction. Traditionally, the body mass index (BMI) is used to describe anthropometric measurements and to assess weight-related health risks. However, the abdominal circumference (AC) might also be a valuable parameter to estimate this risk. This study aims to describe an association between the BMI and the AC.Material and Methods. Participants were recruited during the Brussels Food Fair in 2014. They completed a questionnaire with their medical history, and health related parameters such as blood pressur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed correlation coefficient is similar to those from the meta-analysis by Vazquez et al,as well as in the study of Flegal et al, Wilmet et al, but considerably lower coefficients presented are in the study in Nigeria [2,14,15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The observed correlation coefficient is similar to those from the meta-analysis by Vazquez et al,as well as in the study of Flegal et al, Wilmet et al, but considerably lower coefficients presented are in the study in Nigeria [2,14,15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Many authors support the use of waist circumference as a measurement of overweight and obesity in other to predict health risks in people [1][2][3]6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The previously derived ERS used a variable ‘waist circumference’ which was not available in the ESTHER study and hence we replaced it with ‘body mass index’. Both variables are positively correlated and commonly used to assess weight-related health risks 60 . The ERS for each participant was built by summing up the score points for age (0 for <55 years, 1 for 55 to <60 years, 2 for 60 to <65 years, 3 for 65 to <70 years, or 4 for ≥70 years), sex (0 for female or 1 for male), first-degree relative with CRC (1 for ≥1 relative or 0 for other), body mass index (0 for < 25, 1 for 25 to <30, or 2 for ≥30 kg/m 2 ), and cigarette smoking (0 for 0 pack-years, 2 for >0 to <30 pack-years, or 4 for ≥30 pack-years).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retrospective clinical evaluation of baseline MetS status was based on NCEP ATP III criteria. 27 Waist circumference was not measured in reSURFACE 1/2, so body mass index (BMI)dwhich correlates well with waist circumference and MetS status [28][29][30][31][32][33] dwas used as a surrogate for the abdominal obesity component of MetS. Patients meeting 3 or more of the following 5 criteria were classified as having MetS: BMI of greater than 30 kg/m 2 , triglyceride levels of 150 mg/dl or greater, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol of less than 40 mg/dl for men or less than 50 mg/dl for women, blood pressure of 130 mm Hg or greater (systolic) and/or 85 mm Hg or greater (diastolic), and fasting glucose of 110 mg/dl or greater.…”
Section: Treatments and Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%