1986
DOI: 10.1016/0165-4608(86)90134-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between chromosomal abnormalities and blast phenotype in the blast crisis of Ph-positive CGL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lymphoid-type transformation represented 32.2% (N = 29) of the total, a figure similar to those reported [4,5,13]. Of the patients tested, all were Ia and CD10 positive, with varying positivity for CD20 and CD19.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lymphoid-type transformation represented 32.2% (N = 29) of the total, a figure similar to those reported [4,5,13]. Of the patients tested, all were Ia and CD10 positive, with varying positivity for CD20 and CD19.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The reason why the chronic phase of CML transforms to a particular lineage of acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) is not known, but such transformations usually follow lines that are the normal developmental lines of the hematopoietic stem cell. Recent attempts have been made to correlate the additional cytogenetic changes that accompany or precede blast crisis with the lineage of the blast cells, but definitive patterns have not emerged [4,5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T h e secondary anomalies are clearly nonrandom, the most frequent being trisomy 8, an isochromosome for the long arm of chromosome 17, trisomy 19, and an extra Ph chromosome (Mitelman, 1993). These secondary changes not only serve as valuable prognostic indicators in CML, but the type of additional aberrations also, albeit only to a lesser degree, seems to correlate with the phenotypic features of the ensuing acute leukemia (O'Malley and Garson, 1985;Parreira et al, 1986;Bernstein and Gale, 1990). Thus, the secondary anomalies are not merely indicative of genomic instability in the tumor cell population but are also most likely associated with the tumor phenotype and are of significance in the progression of the neoplasm, although no such causality has been proven.…”
Section: Evolution and Biologic Impact Of Neoplasia-associated Abnormmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It has been reported that additional abnormalities as such are more common in myeloid than in lymphoid BC and that +8, +19, and, in particular, i(17q) characterize myeloid BC, whereas monosomy 7 and various, atypical additional changes are typically found in lymphoid BC [53, 69, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182]. However, some studies have failed to corroborate these associations [51, 52], and reviewing available literature data (table 4), the only significant differences in cytogenetic evolution patterns between myeloid and lymphoid BC are a higher incidence of i(17q) in myeloid BC and higher frequencies of monosomy 7 and hypodiploidy in lymphoid BC.…”
Section: Secondary Aberrations In Relation To Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%