2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between clinical findings and CT-measured displacement in patients with fractures of the zygomaticomaxillary complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second patient (unilateral LeFort II fracture with contralateral zygomatico-maxillary complex fracture), intermaxillary elastics were used for guiding the occlusion. Post-trauma occlusal discrepancy in this patient could be attributed to haematoma, swelling and inhibition of muscular movement due to the fractured zygomatico-maxillary complex [17]. Occlusal discrepancy in this case could also be attributed to the presence of comminution of all the fracture sites [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In the second patient (unilateral LeFort II fracture with contralateral zygomatico-maxillary complex fracture), intermaxillary elastics were used for guiding the occlusion. Post-trauma occlusal discrepancy in this patient could be attributed to haematoma, swelling and inhibition of muscular movement due to the fractured zygomatico-maxillary complex [17]. Occlusal discrepancy in this case could also be attributed to the presence of comminution of all the fracture sites [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…First, operative errors can be decreased but they can never be eliminated completely. Second, a slight distortion exists in the CT scan model [ 14 , 15 ]. Third, computer-assisted planning processes and validation processes have slight errors as well [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the treatment results were assessed, there were still mistakes in the distances and measures despite getting good results. Some of the factors that probably contributed to these errors include: errors in obtaining the CT DICOM data (errors in image acquisition), errors during segmentation of DICOM data using the segmentation or the computer aided design (CAD) software (errors in creating the 3D models or in designing the 3D reduction guides), and errors during 3D printing of the guides related to the rapid prototyping process (33,34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%