2016
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation Between Concentrations of Fecal Calprotectin and Outcomes of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis in a Phase 2 Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
51
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefit/risk imbalance and cost/efficacy ratio have been considered: the test is already refunded in some European countries. Therefore, fecal calprotectin is a non-invasive marker that can objectively assess mucosal healing, and its use is now systematically recommended not only for IBD diagnosis [72] but also in protocols evaluating new treatments [31,73].…”
Section: Medico-economic Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefit/risk imbalance and cost/efficacy ratio have been considered: the test is already refunded in some European countries. Therefore, fecal calprotectin is a non-invasive marker that can objectively assess mucosal healing, and its use is now systematically recommended not only for IBD diagnosis [72] but also in protocols evaluating new treatments [31,73].…”
Section: Medico-economic Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…133,134 Lower FC levels have been associated with response to biologic therapy and clinical outcomes including clinical remission and mucosal healing. 135,136 Perhaps most useful, among patients in remission, FC has been reported to increase earlier and remain elevated prior to clinical or endoscopic relapse of disease, 137 which may indicate a role for prospective or routine monitoring with FC to identify those patients at greatest risk of relapse.…”
Section: Future Directions For Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, a significant difference could be observed in other biomarkers (13). Sanborn WJ and colleagues conducted a study on 194 patients with ulcerative colitis and showed that setting "150" as a cut off for calprotectin does not have a proper accuracy for categorizing patients from the clinical severity and endoscopic point of view (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%