2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2012.01069.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between corneal sensitivity and quantity of reflex tearing in cows, horses, goats, sheep, dogs, cats, rabbits, and guinea pigs

Abstract: The high variance and low reproducibility of results suggest that the measuring devices are inappropriate to assess the evaluated parameters. Therefore, no assured correlation between the corneal sensitivity and the quantity of reflex tearing could be found.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

12
65
2
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
12
65
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous investigations have shown no significant differences between an individual's two eyes with respect to CTT evaluations (GOLEBIOWSKY et al, 2011;WIESER et al, 2013). Moreover, two measurement results per animal can hinder the degrees of freedom in the statistical model, leading to a reduction in statistical power, and the need for a higher caseload (GOLEBIOWSKY et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Previous investigations have shown no significant differences between an individual's two eyes with respect to CTT evaluations (GOLEBIOWSKY et al, 2011;WIESER et al, 2013). Moreover, two measurement results per animal can hinder the degrees of freedom in the statistical model, leading to a reduction in statistical power, and the need for a higher caseload (GOLEBIOWSKY et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esthesiometry has been studied in different species, including humans (GOLEBIOWSY et al, 2011), cats (CHANG-LING, 1989BLOCKER & VAN DER WOERT, 2001;WIESER et al, 2013), rabbits (WIESER et al, 2013), dogs (BARRETT et al, 1991WIESER et al, 2013;KOBASHIGAWA et al, 2015), chinchillas (LIMA et al, 2010;MULLER et al, 2010), alpacas (WELIHOZKIY et al, 2011;RANKIN et al, 2012), goat, guinea pigs, cows and sheep (WIESER et al, 2013), birds (LACERDA et al, 2014), turtles (SOMMA et al, 2015) and horses (BROOKS et al, 2001;KAPS et al, 2003;WIESER et al, 2013). Previous investigations have shown no significant differences between an individual's two eyes with respect to CTT evaluations (GOLEBIOWSKY et al, 2011;WIESER et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations