Correlation between crestal alveolar bone loss with intracanal bacteria and apical lesion area in necrotic teeth

Muniz, Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes; Montagner, Francisco; Jacinto, Rogério de Castilho; Rösing, Cassiano Kuchenbecker; Gomes, Brenda Paula Figueiredo de Almeida

doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.07.007

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The mean of the mesial and distal measurements corresponded to the marginal bone level in each implant. 21 The values of peri-implant bone level were assumed as positive when the marginal bone was coronal to the implant platform and negative when the marginal bone was positioned apical to the platform. To compensate image distortions, a linear calibration of the software was made for each implant based on their actual size.…”

Section: Radiograph Exammentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient-, implant- and prosthetic-related factors on peri-implant mucositis and bone loss

NÍCOLI,

MALZONI,

COSTA NETO

et al. 2024

Braz. oral res.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Peri-implant diseases, including peri-implant mucositis (PIM) and peri-implantitis, are a chronic inflammatory disorder triggered by bacterial biofilm in susceptible hosts. Potential risk factors for peri-implant diseases include smoking, dental plaque accumulation, poor oral hygiene, genetics, and absence of peri-implant keratinized mucosa. This cohort study aimed to evaluate the influence of patient-, implant-, and prosthetic-related factors on PIM and peri-implant bone loss (PBL) around dental implants after 1 year of loading. A total of 54 subjects (22 males and 32 females) were included in the study. Peri-implant clinical parameters were assessed and standardized periapical radiographs of each dental implant were obtained 15 days after the definitive prosthesis installation (baseline) and at 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. A total of 173 implants were evaluated. PIM affected 44.8% of the implants and no significant association was found between the investigated parameters and PIM incidence, except for type of implant connection. A significantly higher incidence of PIM (80.0%) was observed for implants with internal hexagon connection type after 1 year of follow-up (p = 0.015). Moreover, a mean PBL of 0.35 ± 1.89 mm was observed and no dental implant was affected by peri-implantitis after 1 year of function.No specific influence of patient, implant, or prosthetic factors on PBL was observed. No association was found between the occurrence of PIM/PBL and the patient-, implant-, and prosthetic-related factors investigated in this cohort study, except for the type of dental-implant connection.

show abstract

Section: Radiograph Exammentioning

confidence: 99%