1993
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3697(93)90270-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between electronegativity and high temperature superconductivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is basically confirmed in Ref. [21]. Tendencies for T C to be increasing with (χ a -χ c ) and [χ c /(χ c + χ a )] above threshold levels of 1.90 and 0.176, respectively, were also indicated [22,51].…”
Section: Electronegativity and The Charge-regulating Type I Cationssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result is basically confirmed in Ref. [21]. Tendencies for T C to be increasing with (χ a -χ c ) and [χ c /(χ c + χ a )] above threshold levels of 1.90 and 0.176, respectively, were also indicated [22,51].…”
Section: Electronegativity and The Charge-regulating Type I Cationssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In earlier work [19][20][21][22], the average electronegativities of the cations (χ c ) and/or anions (χ a ) of various high-T C compounds, calculated using several different methods (arithmetic or geometric averaging, ionization potentials, etc. ), were considered and compared to corresponding transition temperatures.…”
Section: Electronegativity and The Charge-regulating Type I Cationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This also supports the validity of calculated values of B. On the basis of Table2 we can also say that the Murnaghan equation works well for high-temperature superconductors [22].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%