“…After follow-up, the serum estradiol and progesterone levels on the day of embryo transfer were not predictive for clinical pregnancy and live births after vitrified-warmed embryo transfer in the natural cycle. In previous studies that evaluated the prognostic factors for pregnancy outcomes after FET cycles with slow-freezing protocols, the following variables were reported: women's age and BMI, 11,21,22 baseline antral follicle count and AMH level in the index stimulation cycle, 23 etiology of infertility, 24 type of fertilization methods, 25 number of previous pregnancies, 24 number of previous ART treatments, 24,25 presence of pregnancy in the fresh cycle, 8 of embryo and embryo quality at the time of freezing, 11,27-29 embryo damage after thawing, [29][30][31][32] presence of at least one good-quality embryo, 11 and use of embryos that have undergone further development after thawing at the time of embryo transfer. 29,33,34 A few studies assessed the prognostic factors for clinical outcomes after FET cycles with the vitrified-warmed method, and these demonstrated that women's age and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome as reason for vitrification, 35 fewer previous ART treatment cycles, embryo transfer using at least one intact embryo, and embryo quality after warming 12 were significant prognostic factors.…”