2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between membrane surface properties, polymer nature and fouling in skim milk ultrafiltration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…characterized the fibril formation in cowpea, chickpea, and lentil proteins by using AFM, and evaluated the changes in the fibril's dimensions at different heat treatment times as a function of the height and contour length of the images. The characterization of the surface of proteins aggregates could be related to their capacity to interact with other compounds such as water or oil (Bildyukevich et al, 2020;Wen et al, 2020). In this work, the smallest microparticles were obtained at pH 9 (Figure H7) and 3 MF cycles and were more stable due to water-protein interactions.…”
Section: Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…characterized the fibril formation in cowpea, chickpea, and lentil proteins by using AFM, and evaluated the changes in the fibril's dimensions at different heat treatment times as a function of the height and contour length of the images. The characterization of the surface of proteins aggregates could be related to their capacity to interact with other compounds such as water or oil (Bildyukevich et al, 2020;Wen et al, 2020). In this work, the smallest microparticles were obtained at pH 9 (Figure H7) and 3 MF cycles and were more stable due to water-protein interactions.…”
Section: Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…It was previously shown that when Fe-BTC is embedded into the ChS interlayer, agglomerates of Fe-BTC appear on the surface of the membrane selective layer ( Figure 3 and Figure 4 ), which leads to a substantial increase in surface roughness ( Figure 5 and Figure 6 ; Table 3 ) and a slight increase in water contact angle (from 30 ± 2° to 36 ± 2°) ( Figure 7 ) of the selective layer surface [ 83 ]. It is commonly known that the contact angle also depends on the surface roughness parameters, along with the chemical nature of the surface [ 87 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of inversion involved a two-phase conversion of the homogeneous PS solution, one of which is a solid phase; it was rich in the polymer and formed the membrane. A liquid phase is another one; it produced pores [37][38][39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Fig1 Graphical Representation Of Membrane Preparation By Phase Inversion Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%