2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-011-1430-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between radionuclides associated with zircon and monazite in beach sand of Rosetta, Egypt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The heavy, heavy magnetic and heavy non-magnetic (%wt.) fractions are given in Table 1, are in well agreement with the natural radioactivity levels reported by the literature concerning data from regular background radiation areas [3,14,15,[17][18][19]. Moreover, data of samples obtained by heavy minerals enriched horizons, are comparable with the levels reported for high background radiation level areas in India, Brazil and Sithonia, Greece [11,13,16,18,36].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The heavy, heavy magnetic and heavy non-magnetic (%wt.) fractions are given in Table 1, are in well agreement with the natural radioactivity levels reported by the literature concerning data from regular background radiation areas [3,14,15,[17][18][19]. Moreover, data of samples obtained by heavy minerals enriched horizons, are comparable with the levels reported for high background radiation level areas in India, Brazil and Sithonia, Greece [11,13,16,18,36].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The absorbed gamma dose rate received implying a uniform distribution of radionuclides, was estimated using the following equation considering the necessary conversion factors (in nGy h −1 by Bq kg −1 ) to transform the activity concentrations of 40 K, 238 U and 232 Th(C K , C U and C Th respectively) in absorbed dose rate at 1m above the ground [5,17,[42][43][44][45][46].…”
Section: Exposure Dose Rates Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fractions are given in Table 1. The textural group of each sample is given in Table 1 Table 2 (with the exception of samples 42, 46, 47 and 50 which display elevated levels of natural radioactivity), are in good agreement with the natural radioactivity levels reported by the literature concerning data from regular background radiation areas [9,14,15,17]. Moreover, data from samples 49Ep, 50Ep and 54Ep with high heavy mineral concentrations are comparable with the levels reported for high background radiation level areas in India and Brazil [8,11,13,16].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…More specifically, two categories of people were assumed: (a) tourists spending on the beach 8 h per day for 3 weeks and (b) local people working 10 h per day for 10 weeks on the beach. The absorbed gamma dose rate received implying a uniform distribution of radionuclides, was estimated using the following equation considering the necessary conversion factors (in nGy h −1 by Bq kg −1 ) to transform the activity concentrations of 40 K, 238 U and 232 Th (C K , C U and C T respectively) in absorbed dose rate at 1m above the ground [2,17].…”
Section: Exposure Dose Rates Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation