2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jma.2020.02.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between test temperature, applied load and wear transition of Mg97Zn1Y2 alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first stages, the wear rates were found to be below 35 × 10 −12 m 3 m −1 . Such a wear rate limit value in the first stages is quite similar to the wear rate at SW transition state for pure titanium pin sliding against hardened gauge steel with hardness 701HV5 at 0.5 m/s, i.e., 30 × 10 −12 m 3 m −1 [19], and it is also approximately equal to the wear rates at SW transition state at 0.5 m/s for several Mg alloys including AZ91, Mg97Zn1Y2 and Mg-Gd-Y-Zr alloys, e.g., 39.9 × 10 −12 m 3 m −1 for AZ91 alloy, 39.8 × 10 −12 m 3 m −1 for Mg97Zn1Y2 alloy, 31.7 × 10 −12 m 3 m −1 for Mg-10.1Gd-1.4Y-0.4Zr alloy [12,20,21]. Therefore, it can be preliminarily assumed that the wear is mild in the first stage, but it is severe in the second stage, and the corresponding loads for SW transition at 20 and 50 • C are 120 N and 140 N, respectively.…”
Section: Wear At 20 and 50 • Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the first stages, the wear rates were found to be below 35 × 10 −12 m 3 m −1 . Such a wear rate limit value in the first stages is quite similar to the wear rate at SW transition state for pure titanium pin sliding against hardened gauge steel with hardness 701HV5 at 0.5 m/s, i.e., 30 × 10 −12 m 3 m −1 [19], and it is also approximately equal to the wear rates at SW transition state at 0.5 m/s for several Mg alloys including AZ91, Mg97Zn1Y2 and Mg-Gd-Y-Zr alloys, e.g., 39.9 × 10 −12 m 3 m −1 for AZ91 alloy, 39.8 × 10 −12 m 3 m −1 for Mg97Zn1Y2 alloy, 31.7 × 10 −12 m 3 m −1 for Mg-10.1Gd-1.4Y-0.4Zr alloy [12,20,21]. Therefore, it can be preliminarily assumed that the wear is mild in the first stage, but it is severe in the second stage, and the corresponding loads for SW transition at 20 and 50 • C are 120 N and 140 N, respectively.…”
Section: Wear At 20 and 50 • Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Titanium oxide TiO and iron oxide (magnetite) were confirmed to form on the two worn surfaces. The overall surface damage is mild in the first stages, and these wear mechanisms also usually operate in mild wear for Al-based alloys and Mg-based alloys under room and elevated-temperature sliding conditions [12,13,20].…”
Section: Wear At 20 and 50 • Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, wear mechanisms in the second stage were severe plastic deformation. It is well accepted that severe plastic deformation is a type of severe wear for magnesium alloys since surface material loses its original good ability to resist plastic flow [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Therefore, according to the wear mechanism operating in this stage, wear enters severe wear regime in the second stage even though the wear rate value does not increase continuously throughout the stage.…”
Section: Wear Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical applied load can be expressed as Equation (2). As mentioned above, the real origin of SWT is the surface softening effect due to DRX realization, and it has been reported that the plastic deformation strain nearby surface is usually substantial enough for deformation requirement of DRX realization [9,11]. Thus, the surface temperature is the only one key factor for DRX realization.…”
Section: Relationship Between Critical Applied Load For Swt and Test Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation