2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0734-743x(02)00073-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between the accuracy of a SHPB test and the stress uniformity based on numerical experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
83
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SHPB specimen and pressure bars are simulated as a structural problem to obtain a 'reconstituted' axial stressstrain relation, whose deviation from the input axial stress-strain curve indicates the error due to the violation of the fundamental assumptions in an SHPB test. This so-called 'reconstitution method' has been adopted by some researchers, e.g., Bertholf and Karnes (1975), Meng and Li (2003) and Li and Meng (2003). The advantage of using a strain-rateindependent stress-strain input curve is that all discrepancies between the 'reconstituted' stress-strain curve and the input stress-strain curve are not due to the strain-rate effect, but due to other factors, which should be correctly interpreted in the analyses of the SHPB test results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SHPB specimen and pressure bars are simulated as a structural problem to obtain a 'reconstituted' axial stressstrain relation, whose deviation from the input axial stress-strain curve indicates the error due to the violation of the fundamental assumptions in an SHPB test. This so-called 'reconstitution method' has been adopted by some researchers, e.g., Bertholf and Karnes (1975), Meng and Li (2003) and Li and Meng (2003). The advantage of using a strain-rateindependent stress-strain input curve is that all discrepancies between the 'reconstituted' stress-strain curve and the input stress-strain curve are not due to the strain-rate effect, but due to other factors, which should be correctly interpreted in the analyses of the SHPB test results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further discussion on the 'reconstitution method' is given in Meng and Li (2003) and Li and Meng (2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bischoff and Perry (1991) also commented that the height-width ratio of the specimen as well as its overall size could affect the crack pattern by influencing end boundary effects and thus affect the maximum strength and deformability of the tested specimen. Meng and Li (2003) investigated the effect of frictional coefficient by numerical simulation and showed that the coefficient of friction has greater influence on the lateral constrains for a shorter specimen than a longer specimen. Further investigations on the DIF in concrete-like materials will be presented in a companion paper by Li et al(2009) based on numerical simulation.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB), which was first introduced by Hopkinson [1] in 1914 and further developed by Kolsky [2], Davies and Hunter [3], as well as others [4][5][6][7], is an effective method to characterize the dynamic behavior of materials at intermediate strain rates. The SHPB has been widely used to investigate the dynamic mechanical properties of materials under uniaxial compression [5,6,[8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%