2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation Between the Basic Video Laryngostroboscopic Parameters and Multidimensional Voice Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Endoscopic and stroboscopic assessments of laryngeal structure and function offer valuable information regarding vocal fold mobility, phonatory glottal closure, the difference in level between vocal folds, and the presence of laryngeal compensation in patients with UVFP. These parameters are closely correlated with the perceptual and subjective voice outcome indicators [ 31 ]. Nevertheless, physicians and SLPs should be cautious about using visualization tools as the sole methods on which treatment is directly based.…”
Section: Guidelines For the Management Of Uvfpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoscopic and stroboscopic assessments of laryngeal structure and function offer valuable information regarding vocal fold mobility, phonatory glottal closure, the difference in level between vocal folds, and the presence of laryngeal compensation in patients with UVFP. These parameters are closely correlated with the perceptual and subjective voice outcome indicators [ 31 ]. Nevertheless, physicians and SLPs should be cautious about using visualization tools as the sole methods on which treatment is directly based.…”
Section: Guidelines For the Management Of Uvfpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recorded F 0 only for all MDVP parameters because other parameters, including the noise-to-harmonic ratio, short-term frequency perturbation (ie, jitter; %) or short-term amplitude perturbation (ie, shimmer; %) had shown no significant difference in our previous studies. 21,22 The minimal F 0 (F 0 min), maximal F 0 (F 0 max) and corresponding range of the intensity were also obtained from VRP combining the methods described by Hallin et al and Uloza et al 23,24 Patients were asked to sustain the vowel /a:/. Subsequently, they were asked to produce the tone as softly and then as loudly as they could.…”
Section: Conventional Voice Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this date, various works have investigated relations between vocal fold movements and resulting acoustics. However, often only linear relations were explored [33][34][35][36] or data from a small number of subjects (N � 20) was used [33,[35][36][37]. Some relations between vocal fold oscillations and resulting acoustic signal are known with the most obvious one being the strong correlation between fundamental frequency of the vocal fold oscillations and the fundamental frequency of the resulting acoustic signal in sustained phonation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%