2014
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu2571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between the photon index and X-ray luminosity of black hole X-ray binaries and active galactic nuclei: observations and interpretation

Abstract: We investigate the observed correlation between the 2-10 keV X-ray luminosity (in unit of the Eddington luminosity; l X ≡ L X /L Edd ) and the photon index (Γ) of the X-ray spectrum for both black hole X-ray binaries (BHBs) and active galactic nuclei (AGNs). We construct a large sample, with 10 −9 < ∼ l X < ∼ 10 −1 . We find that Γ is positively and negatively correlated with l X when l X > ∼ 10 −3 and 10 −6.5 < ∼ l X < ∼ 10 −3 respectively, while Γ is nearly a constant when l X < ∼ 10 −6.5 . We explain the ab… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

16
98
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
16
98
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is somewhat surprising to find such a hard spectrum at the very low Eddington luminosity observed. Typically the photon index decreases with decreasing flux only down to a transitional luminosity of ∼1% L Edd , after which the photon index begins to increase again with lower luminosities (see, e.g., Tomsick et al 2001;Wu & Gu 2008;Yang et al 2015). During quiescence the photon index has been seen to increase to Γ ≥ 2 (Corbel et al 2006;Plotkin et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is somewhat surprising to find such a hard spectrum at the very low Eddington luminosity observed. Typically the photon index decreases with decreasing flux only down to a transitional luminosity of ∼1% L Edd , after which the photon index begins to increase again with lower luminosities (see, e.g., Tomsick et al 2001;Wu & Gu 2008;Yang et al 2015). During quiescence the photon index has been seen to increase to Γ ≥ 2 (Corbel et al 2006;Plotkin et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may indicate that thermal Comptonization in an optically thin plasma is still the dominating effect in GRS 1739−278, even though a strong radio jet is present (e.g., Loh et al, in prep. ), as a jet-dominated synchrotron spectrum would result in a softer photon index (Esin et al 1997;Yang et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As BHXBs fade from the low-hard state toward quiescence, their X-ray spectra become softer (e.g., Tomsick et al 2001Tomsick et al , 2004Kalemci et al 2005;Wu & Gu 2008;Sobolewska et al 2011;Armas Padilla et al 2013) until they display G » 2.1 (e.g., Kong et al 2002;Corbel et al 2006;Plotkin et al 2013;Armas Padilla et al 2014;Reynolds et al 2014;Yang et al 2015). From an ensemble of quiescent BHXBs, Plotkin et al (2013) argue that the X-ray spectral softening completes by -L 10 5…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In modeling the SED of quiescent BHs with ADAF-jet model, Xie et al (2014) suggested that the X-ray emission of V404 Cyg in quiescent state should be dominated by jet based on its X-ray shape (see also Yuan et al 2009, for a couple of quiescent supermassive BHs), where jet produce power-law X-ray spectrum while the inverse-Compton spectrum from ADAF is normally curved. The soften of X-ray spectrum in quiescent BHs can be explained by both ADAF and jet models separately, where the bremsstrahlung radiation will contribute to X-ray emission (Esin et al 1997) while the synchrotron emission normally produce a power-law X-ray with Γ ∼ 2 (e.g., Yuan et al 2009;Xie et al 2014;Yang et al 2015). Broadband X-ray observation in quiescent BHs and better dealing with Comptonization in ADAF are expected to further test this issue.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these similarities, Dong et al (2014) Merloni et al (2003) and Dong et al (2014) with much different slopes of ξX are most possibly regulated by radiatively inefficient and radiatively efficient BH sources respectively. Yang et al (2015) proposed that the X-ray emission in quiescent state may be dominated by the jet and the value of Γ should keep as a constant while the X-ray emission dominantly come from ADAF in LH state. The spectral energy distribution (SED) modeling also preferred the pure jet model for these quiescent BHs (e.g., Xie et al 2014;Plotkin et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%