2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-007-0551-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between vaginal stiffness index and pelvic floor disorder quality-of-life scales

Abstract: The objective of this study was to determine if vaginal stiffness index, an in vivo vaginal biomechanical property, is correlated with pelvic floor disorder symptom distress, impact on quality of life, or sexual function as measured by disease-specific quality-of-life scales. Forty-eight women completed validated quality-of-life scales (pelvic floor distress inventory-short form, pelvic floor impact questionnaire, and pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire) and underwent in vivo vagina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ideal measurement of the biomechanical properties would be done in in vivo conditions. Tissue suction and indentation techniques constitute non-destructive and less invasive tests that have been used to evaluate the mechanical properties of human tissues [20,21]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideal measurement of the biomechanical properties would be done in in vivo conditions. Tissue suction and indentation techniques constitute non-destructive and less invasive tests that have been used to evaluate the mechanical properties of human tissues [20,21]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epstein et al compared vaginal biomechanical property measurements for women with pelvic organ prolapse with patients with normal vaginal support . Tissue extensibility was measured with a cutometer‐like device (Dermalab) with a 10 mm orifice.…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some limitations of the present study can be remarked since the ideal measurement of the biomechanical properties would be done in in vivo conditions [27,28]. Despite some attempts, this conceptualization of the ‘ideal conditions’ does not provide enough information for an adequate engineering modeling and simulation of biological structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%