2019
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2018.6254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of Blood Biomarkers and Biomarker Panels with Traumatic Findings on Computed Tomography after Traumatic Brain Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
70
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
70
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these, elevated blood Aβ40 and Aβ42 fragments have been detected acutely and chronically after mTBI (Lejbman et al, 2016;Bogoslovsky et al, 2017). However, blood Aβ levels appear to lack specificity for TBI (Posti et al, 2019). As such, in both mTBI and PTSD, there is a current need for biomarkers to help characterize biological changes differentially associated with each disorder in order to improve clinical detection and monitoring of long-term consequences of mTBI and PTSD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, elevated blood Aβ40 and Aβ42 fragments have been detected acutely and chronically after mTBI (Lejbman et al, 2016;Bogoslovsky et al, 2017). However, blood Aβ levels appear to lack specificity for TBI (Posti et al, 2019). As such, in both mTBI and PTSD, there is a current need for biomarkers to help characterize biological changes differentially associated with each disorder in order to improve clinical detection and monitoring of long-term consequences of mTBI and PTSD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, strategies for diagnosing and treating TBI in patients are limited [12]. Imaging tests (computed tomography, CT or magnetic resonance imaging, MRI) are generally applied to diagnose and classify TBI in clinical practice but are limited because of low sensitivity in patients with mild injuries [13,14]. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or blood tests are useful in the assessment of the severity of the injury and subsequent recovery of TBI patients by detecting protein or miRNA components in the peripheral blood [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging tests (computed tomography, CT or magnetic resonance imaging, MRI) are generally applied to diagnose and classify TBI in clinical practice but are limited because of low sensitivity in patients with mild injuries [13,14]. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or blood tests are useful in the assessment of the severity of the injury and subsequent recovery of TBI patients by detecting protein or miRNA components in the peripheral blood [14]. For instance, protein tests that can detect cytokines, chemokines, tau, calcium-binding protein S100B, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), ubiquitin carboxyterminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and myelin basic protein (MBP) are candidates for classification and prognostication of TBI patients [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies of sports-related mTBI evaluating concussed professional ice hockey players and boxers after a bout, tau and neurofilament L are elevated in the blood, and in the former group and in a manner similar to SNTF, predict the persistence of post-concussion symptoms based on the length of the delay in return to play. On the other hand, studies published to date of tau and NFL as candidate markers for TBI treated in the emergency department have included cases with discernable intracranial lesions on head CT scan, thus precluding evaluation of these markers for prognosis of mTBI (30)(31)(32). Strikingly, SNTF, tau, and neurofilament L are all important structural proteins of the axon whose blood levels rise after sports-related concussion (26)(27)(28), supporting the hypothesis that they all represent surrogate blood biomarkers for the diffuse axonal injury underlying functionally deleterious mTBI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies of tau and NFL as prognostic markers for mTBI treated in the emergency department included complicated TBI cases with intracranial lesions discernable on non-contrast head CT scan, which may be prognostic for worse long-term outcomes (29). Thus far, neither marker has shown utility in this setting for the prognosis of uncomplicated mTBI (30)(31)(32). Biomarkers tied to brain elements other than the axon also have been investigated as candidates for mTBI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%