1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(18)31281-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of cerebral blood flow velocity and regional cerebral blood flow during word generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…fTCD lends itself to determination of hemispheric language dominance. The index of lateralization obtained by fTCD based on word generation is very reliable and closely corresponds to (i) the outcome of the intracarotid amobarbital procedure and (ii) the index of lateralization obtained by fMRI (Deppe et al, 1998;Knecht et al, 1998a). Other techniques like head turning, event-related potentials, transcranial high frequency magnetic stimulation or the dichotic listening test used for the evaluation of language dominance have so far failed to provide results that are reproducible and in sufficient concordance with the intracarotid amobarbital procedure (Bryden and Allard, 1981;Jancke et al, 1992;Jennum et al, 1994;Segalowitz and Berge, 1995;O'Leary et al, 1996;Hugdahl et al, 1997).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…fTCD lends itself to determination of hemispheric language dominance. The index of lateralization obtained by fTCD based on word generation is very reliable and closely corresponds to (i) the outcome of the intracarotid amobarbital procedure and (ii) the index of lateralization obtained by fMRI (Deppe et al, 1998;Knecht et al, 1998a). Other techniques like head turning, event-related potentials, transcranial high frequency magnetic stimulation or the dichotic listening test used for the evaluation of language dominance have so far failed to provide results that are reproducible and in sufficient concordance with the intracarotid amobarbital procedure (Bryden and Allard, 1981;Jancke et al, 1992;Jennum et al, 1994;Segalowitz and Berge, 1995;O'Leary et al, 1996;Hugdahl et al, 1997).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…It thus provides an operational index of laterality which, in many respects, resembles the one obtained by the intracarotid amobarbital procedure (Wada test) (Wada and Rasmussen, 1960). Determination of language lateralization by fTCD matches precisely both the results of fMRI and the Wada test with concordance in every single case (Deppe et al, 1998;Knecht et al, 1998a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations