Volumetricâmodulated arc therapy (VMAT) is emerging as a leading technology in treating earlyâstage, nonâsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). However, two other modalities capable of delivering intensityâmodulated radiation therapy (IMRT) include fixedâbeam and helical TomoTherapy (HT). This study aims to provide an extensive dosimetric comparison among these various IMRT techniques for treating earlyâstage NSCLC with SABR. Ten earlyâstage NSCLC patients were retrospectively optimized using three fixedâbeam techniques via nine to eleven beams (high and low modulation stepâandâshoot (SS), and sliding window (SW)), two VMAT techniques via two partial arcs (SmartArc (SA) and RapidArc (RA)), and three HT techniques via three different fan beam widths (1 cm, 2.5 cm, and 5 cm) for 80 plans total. Fixedâbeam and VMAT plans were generated using flattening filterâfree beams. SS and SA, HT treatment plans, and SW and RA were optimized using Pinnacle v9.1, Tomoplan v.3.1.1, and Eclipse (Acuros XB v11.3 algorithm), respectively. Doseâvolume histogram statistics, dose conformality, and treatment delivery efficiency were analyzed. VMAT treatment plans achieved significantly lower values for contralateral lung normalV5Gyfalse(pâ€0.05false) compared to the HT plans, and significantly lower mean lung dose (p<0.006) compared to HT 5 cm treatment plans. In the comparison between the VMAT techniques, a significant reduction in the total monitor units (p=0.05) was found in the SA plans, while a significant decrease was observed in the dose falloff parameter, normalD2cm, (p=0.05), for the RA treatments. The maximum cord dose was significantly reduced (p=0.017) in grouped RA&SA plans compared to SS. Estimated treatment time was significantly higher for HT and fixedâbeam plans compared to RA&SA (p<0.001). Although, a significant difference was not observed in the RA vs. SA (p=0.393). RA&SA outperformed HT in all parameters measured. Despite an increase in dose to the heart and bronchus, this study demonstrates that VMAT is dosimetrically advantageous in treating earlyâstage NSCLC with SABR compared to fixedâbeam, while providing significantly shorter treatment times.PACS number(s): 87.55.D, 87.55.dk, 87.55.kd