2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.06.1333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of Clinical and Dosimetric Parameters With Radiographic Lung Injury Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study has also demonstrated a significant association between volume of radiographic density changes and patient-related parameters such as age, significant smoking history, and GOLD score. 22 Therefore, our study indicates that the HU dose response averaging in previous methods might have resulted in an overgeneralization of the dose response of lung normal tissue post-SBRT. The decrease in single mode cases with respect to time indicates an increase in bimodal behavior as the injury volume develops into chronic fibrosis over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A recent study has also demonstrated a significant association between volume of radiographic density changes and patient-related parameters such as age, significant smoking history, and GOLD score. 22 Therefore, our study indicates that the HU dose response averaging in previous methods might have resulted in an overgeneralization of the dose response of lung normal tissue post-SBRT. The decrease in single mode cases with respect to time indicates an increase in bimodal behavior as the injury volume develops into chronic fibrosis over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Few studies have specifically examined the relationship between dose and CT changes after SBRT or radiosurgery. Hof et al 9 correlated the contoured radiographic NTC to treatment dose by finding the fractional intersection between lung volumes receiving different dose levels (6)(7)(8)(8)(9)(10)(10)(11)(12)(12)(13)(14)(14)(15)(16)(16)(17)(18)(18)(19)(20)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35) and the NTC volume. Our method incorporates the same concept with a more direct approach of simply extracting the differential dose volume distribution of the contoured volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation