Correlation of condylar kinematics in children with gender, facial type and weight

Reicheneder, Claudia; Kardari, Zoi; Proff, Peter; Fanghaenel, Jochen; Faltermeier, Andreas; Römer, Piero

doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2013.01.012

Cited by 10 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Weffort and de Fantini (2010) state that subjects with distinct facial characteristics will demonstrate smaller or larger differences between arch relationships, even in the presence of the same amount of the condylar displacement. Jaw tracking devices with six degrees of freedom provide complete knowledge of the three dimensional movements of the entire mandible (Naeije et al, 1999) and are standardly used for investigation of temporomandibular joint function and morphology (Cimic et al, 2014;Reicheneder et al, 2013;Tymofiyeva et al, 2007;Reicheneder et al, 2008;Bernhardt et al, 1999;Nagerl et al, 1999). Obrez and Gallo (2006) A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t transformation of the obtained data has it been possible to estimate condylar movements relatively accurately.…”

Section: Review Of the Literature Shows Different Opinions About Impamentioning

confidence: 98%

Centric slide in different Angle's classes of occlusion

Čimić

Badel

Šimunković

et al. 2016

Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Review Of the Literature Shows Different Opinions About Impamentioning

confidence: 98%

Centric slide in different Angle's classes of occlusion

Čimić

Badel

Šimunković

et al. 2016

Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The accuracy of the method has been confirmed in previous publications ( 12 ). Mandibular movement recording instruments provide information on condylar position in real time period, and are standardly used for investigation of temporomandibular joint anatomy and function ( 13 , 14 ). Obrez and Gallo ( 15 ) reported that assessment of condylar position with relative precision has been possible since the development of a three-dimensional device for mandibular recording with six degrees of freedom (mathematical transformation).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reproducibility of the Obtained Centric Relation Records in Patients with Disc Displacement with Reduction

Čimić

Šimunković

Mlakar

et al. 2018

Acta Stomatol Croat

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate reproducibility of the position of centric relation in patients with disc displacement with reduction.Materials and methodsThe test group included 30 subjects, diagnosed with disc displacement with reduction in right, left or both joints. The control group included 12 individuals with no signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders. Using chin point guidance with a jig, centric relation record was made three times by every participant, in a single session. Left and right condylar position for each centric relation record was determined and recorded using the electronic ultrasonic measuring device. The data were transferred to the computer, processed and analyzed. Condylar distances between centric relation records were measured (anteroposterior, vertical, transversal and linear values), and the data were statistically analyzed using the t and the F tests.ResultsNo statically significant difference was found between the test and the control groups. Two thirds of study participants demonstrated condylar position of the repeated centric relation recording within the area of 0.3 mm in diameter. For more than 90% of participants that area was within 0.4 mm.ConclusionsThere is no difference in reproducibility of the centric relation between patients with disc displacement with reduction and healthy temporomandibular joint individuals (p>0.05). When doing centric relation record on a patient with disc displacement with reduction there is no need for previous splint therapy and standard precautions are acceptable. The obtained results must be interpreted within the experimental group, and not projected on the other groups of temporomandibular disorders.

show abstract

“…Because of their versatility and accuracy of 0.1mm [21] these devices are widely used in scientific research [22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. The main hindrance is a high purchase and operating cost.…”

Section: Quantitative Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical analysis of diagnostic tools for the temporomandibular joint

Marciniak¹

2018

areh

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The prevalence of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) in the general population is difficult to identify. Depending on the source, values range from 3% to 48.9%. These large discrepancies occur because of two main reasons. The first one is connected with the evolution of the definition and diagnostic criteria of TMD, while the second one concerns the use of different diagnostic tools, protocols, etc. Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) diagnosis is both quantitative and qualitative. Quantitative measurements used in the field of scientific research are highly accurate motion capture systems used for kinematic analysis, while an electronic caliper is applied in a clinical setting. MRI seems optimal in TMJ disc and its dysfunction imaging. In more difficult cases, ultrasound imaging can be used. On the other hand, CT is the best examination for joint imaging. In recent years, qualitative measurements have been dominated by vibroarthrography (VAG), which shows good diagnostic value. Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (RDC/TMD) is the most complex systematized diagnostic tool for TMD. The proposed procedure allows us to differentiate a real TMJ dysfunction from other systemic problems that can manifest themselves in this region of TMJ, such as depression, chronic pain or psychosomatic disorders. RDC/TMD are constantly evaluated and modified in terms of their diagnostic or clinical value by experts associated in the International RDC-TMD Consortium. Currently it is the best tool available for TMD diagnostics. The RDC/TMD questionnaire was translated into Polish, culturally adapted and officially approved by the Consortium. The aim of the study is to review selected TMD diagnostic tools and to assess their diagnostic value.

show abstract

Correlation of condylar kinematics in children with gender, facial type and weight

Cited by 10 publications

References 20 publications

Centric slide in different Angle's classes of occlusion

Centric slide in different Angle's classes of occlusion

Reproducibility of the Obtained Centric Relation Records in Patients with Disc Displacement with Reduction

Critical analysis of diagnostic tools for the temporomandibular joint

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About