2016
DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.191408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of dental age, skeletal age, and chronological age among children aged 9-14 years: A retrospective study

Abstract: The present study showed a strong relation between the developmental ages in mixed dentition population; hence, dental age can be considered as a replacement in the study population.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[123] It is imperative for a dental practitioner treating children and preadolescents to have a proper knowledge of their dental development. To broaden the practitioners’ rationale regarding the effect of growth on dental problems and improve clinical judgment, it is necessary to study the development of teeth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[123] It is imperative for a dental practitioner treating children and preadolescents to have a proper knowledge of their dental development. To broaden the practitioners’ rationale regarding the effect of growth on dental problems and improve clinical judgment, it is necessary to study the development of teeth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As per our findings in both the sexes, the three ages are positively correlated. The positive correlations have also been found in the studies done by Vallejo-Bolanos and Espana-Lopez,[ 8 ] Green,[ 2 ] Hedge and Sood,[ 7 ] Prabhakar et al .,[ 6 ] Litsas and Lucchese,[ 32 ] Palaniswamy et al .,[ 33 ] and Nagaraju et al . [ 34 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dental literature has no scarcity for research related to correlation between dental calcification stages and skeletal maturation stages. But these studies have the following shortcomings: (a) lack of sample size calculation [ 14 21 ], (b) very small sample size [ 17 ], (c) evaluation of maxillary teeth while they are superimposed by other structures [ 22 ], (d) wide age range (patient age greater than 16 years) [ 19 , 20 ], and (e) inclusion of teeth at the age where root formation either has not yet started or has already been completed [ 14 , 18 20 ]. A systematic review and meta-analysis [ 23 ] also pointed out methodology errors and high heterogeneity in the published on this topic research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%