The discussers appreciate the effort made by the authors in proposing an analytical model to predict the mechanical behaviour of hybrid fibre-reinforced concrete (HyFRC or HFRC) taking into consideration the synergy concept (Abadel et al., 2016). However, their experimental results contradict this concept. For example, all the properties of mix M4 (0·2% PPF + 1·2% SF) are lower than those of steel fibre-reinforced concrete (SFRC) having only 1·2% SF, mix M1, that is, negative synergy. Generally, for the same fibre volume fraction (F Vf ), all the properties of HyFRC mixes are lower than those of SFRC mixes, as shown in Figure 10. Furthermore, the modulus of rupture, splitting tensile strength and flexural toughness of SFRC with a lower F Vf , mix 1, are greater than those of mix 3 (SFRC with a higher F Vf ). Although the authors mentioned that 'The fibres were added to plain concrete in parts to prevent fibre balling and to ensure the homogeneity of the concrete mixture. The mixing was done for about 3 min to ensure the proper distribution of fibres in the concrete mass', they did not show the readers any validation for this, such as images of the fracture surfaces of the different types of specimens showing the uniform dispersion of the three different types of fibres, or any statistical analysis of the experimental results, such as the standard deviation or the coefficient of variation. Casting and compaction affect the fibre orientation throughout the specimen and could potentially lead to fibre segregation. Furthermore, different types of fibres require different optimum ranges of rheology of the cementitious mortar to achieve good fibre dispersion. This can lead to a significant challenge in processing hybrid fibres in the same matrix; see, for example, Abou El-Mal et al. (2015).
Authors' replyThe authors would like to thank the discussers for their interest in this paper and their insightful comments on the work. The authors' responses to the individual comments are given below under two main headings.
Synergy in HFRC mixesIn the study under discussion, the synergy in different HFRC mixes was only observed to some extent for mix M7, as mentioned in the section of the original paper entitled 'Discussion of test results'. As the main objective of adding fibres to concrete is to improve the tensile characteristics of the concrete, such as modulus of rupture, splitting tensile strength and direct tensile strength, these properties of HFRC mixes having 1·4% volume fraction of fibres are compared with mix M3 (containing only steel fibres) and shown in Figure 11. It is to be noted here that the tensile characteristics presented in the figure are in terms of the compressive strength of concrete, that is, the ratio of tensile characteristics to the compressive strength. The figure shows the presence of synergy in mix M7. As the ratio of M7 to M3 is slightly greater than unity, the synergy in mix M7 was not strongly claimed in the paper. Other researchers (e.g. Banthia and Gupta, 2004) have also reported synergy eff...