2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-012-2088-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of in situ modulus of deformation with degree of weathering, RMR and Q-system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, a program automatically processes the collected basic information and directly gives the rock mass quality evaluation results of each set of information according to the relevant classification methods. e correlation between RMR and BQ is analyzed and discussed on the basis of engineering example [34][35][36]. Finally, a threedimensional model of rock mass classification is established based on the distance power-inverse ratio method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, a program automatically processes the collected basic information and directly gives the rock mass quality evaluation results of each set of information according to the relevant classification methods. e correlation between RMR and BQ is analyzed and discussed on the basis of engineering example [34][35][36]. Finally, a threedimensional model of rock mass classification is established based on the distance power-inverse ratio method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In South Korea, weathered granite layers are found not only at the ground surface of ancient mountains and hills, but also underlying artificial fill layers or alluvial layers on plains (Sun et al 2005). The decomposed granite layer, as one of the representative geotechnical layers (geo-layers) of the Korean Peninsula (Sun et al 2006), has been studied by geotechnical engineers seeking to quantify the engineering characteristics and apply them to geotechnical design (Antonie et al 1995;Kang et al 2013;Ozcan et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different researchers suggested several empirical equations for estimating the E m based on the values of RMR, Q, RMi and GSI. These empirical equations have been used by designers to estimate the deformation modulus of rock masses (Rashed and Sediek, 1997;Gurocak et al, 2008;Alemdag et al, 2008Alemdag et al, , 2014Kaya et al, 2011;Gurocak and Alemdag, 2012;Kang et al, 2012;Chai et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2014;Alemdag, 2015;Karaman et al 2015). One of the major difficulties in using the existing empirical equations arises from the fact that different results are obtained by using these empirical equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%