2020
DOI: 10.1128/aac.02145-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of Linezolid Hair Concentrations with Plasma Exposure in Patients with Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used in all studies to quantify the various anti-TB drugs from hair (Table 5 ). Only two [ 22 , 84 ] of the 13 studies performed comparative pharmacokinetic studies in plasma as well as hair samples, and simple scatter plots were used to demonstrate correlations. All studies were assessed for the risk of bias and two studies had a moderate risk of bias because of the selection of participants as one study [ 85 ] had 98% female participants and the other [ 22 ] enrolled all male participants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used in all studies to quantify the various anti-TB drugs from hair (Table 5 ). Only two [ 22 , 84 ] of the 13 studies performed comparative pharmacokinetic studies in plasma as well as hair samples, and simple scatter plots were used to demonstrate correlations. All studies were assessed for the risk of bias and two studies had a moderate risk of bias because of the selection of participants as one study [ 85 ] had 98% female participants and the other [ 22 ] enrolled all male participants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only two [22,84] of the 13 studies performed comparative pharmacokinetic studies in plasma as well as hair samples, and simple scatter plots were used to demonstrate correlations. All studies were assessed for the risk of bias and two studies had a moderate risk of bias because of the selection of participants as one study [85] had 98% female participants and the other [22] enrolled all male participants. Other studies [21,[82][83][84][86][87][88][89][90][91][92] had a low overall risk of bias.…”
Section: Hairmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation