2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Arthroscopic Findings of Stability in Juvenile Osteochondritis Dissecans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the pediatric age group, if only one criterion for instability is applied, most lesions will be overcalled, with a specifi city of only 15 % (although the sensitivity will be 100 %). If two criteria are applied, diagnosis will be much more specifi c (about 90 %), but instability will be missed half the time [ 36 ]. Overcalling high-signal fl uid between the fragment and parent bone may contribute to low specifi city.…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the pediatric age group, if only one criterion for instability is applied, most lesions will be overcalled, with a specifi city of only 15 % (although the sensitivity will be 100 %). If two criteria are applied, diagnosis will be much more specifi c (about 90 %), but instability will be missed half the time [ 36 ]. Overcalling high-signal fl uid between the fragment and parent bone may contribute to low specifi city.…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Defining which lesions are unstable is more difficult in youths than adults. Heywood et al 21 found that 21 of 23 juvenile OCD lesions were judged to be unstable on MRI; however, only 10 were unstable at arthroscopy. They used widely accepted MRI criteria to assess stability.…”
Section: Juvenile Osteochondritis Dissecansmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Likely because of the relatively low reported prevalence of osteochondritis dissecans 25 , the current evidence in the literature is based on small sample sizes, often with locations of lesions such as elbow, ankle, and knee combined, for determining the diagnostic performance of MRI relative to arthroscopy in identifying osteochondritis dissecans lesions 24,26,27 . The limitation of most diagnostic studies that examine the validity of screening tools such as MRI and that use arthroscopy as a gold standard comparison is that not all patients identified as having a potential osteochondritis dissecans lesion have an arthroscopic evaluation.…”
Section: Methodological Quality Of the Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity and specificity of the use of combined imaging criteria for characterizing the stability of osteochondritis dissecans lesions were different, depending on the type of osteochondritis dissecans lesion (juvenile or adult), with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity reported for the detection of adult lesions and 100% sensitivity and only 11% specificity for the juvenile form. A study by Heywood et al, which assessed juvenile osteochondritis dissecans lesions in both the knee and talus, yielded a sensitivity of 100% but a specificity of only 15% for diagnosing fragment stability; the concordance between arthroscopic stage and MRI stage was 30% 24 . The study by Heywood et al was not included in the results of the current investigation because the talus and knee sensitivity and specificity were grouped for the study analyses, and information pertaining only to the knee was not provided.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%