We read with interest the study published by Casas-Llera et al. 1 The authors have correlated best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with the structural grading system for foveal hypoplasia developed by our unit. 2 Recently, as recommended by Wilk et al., 3 we have updated the grading system to include two subsets of grade 1 foveal hypoplasia: grade 1a, in which nearly normal pit metrics are observed, and grade 1b, in which the pit is only a shallow indent. We recently published our updated and validated grading system, demonstrating that it can predict future vision in infants and young children with foveal hypoplasia. 4 The subsets of grade 1 do not apply to the cohort reported by Casas-Llera et al., as they only detected grade 2-4 foveal hypoplasia, furthermore we note that their paper was submitted before our latest paper was published. Interestingly, a previous paper by Sannan et al. 5 reported a full spectrum of grade 0-4 foveal hypoplasia in a large cohort of PAX6 mutations.Casas-Llera et al. state that the minimum age they considered appropriate to collaborate with optical coherence tomography (OCT) was 4 years. We would like to highlight that handheld OCT is possible in awake infants with nystagmus from birth in our experience, without sedation or dilation, such as in our latest study with infants as young as 28 days old. 4 We accept that a great number of eye departments do not have access to or experience in handheld OCT imaging, therefore it was reasonable for the authors to exclude children too young to cooperate with conventional OCT.Their study demonstrated that higher foveal hypoplasia grades correlated with poorer BCVA, consistent with findings from our unit and others. 2,4 It would be highly valuable to assess whether BCVA in the younger children improved further over time. Our recent prediction study included OCT data for preverbal infants and young