2012
DOI: 10.5755/j01.eis.0.6.1468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of Objective and Subjective Territorial Development Indices in the World

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These instruments, perspectives and/or procedures are often considered to be under the rubric of QOL (see Sirgy 2011 for a summary of QOL indicators and their applications). Governments from almost every country now seek to apply multiple methods and tools to ascertain the efficacy of development projects (Lonska and Boronenko 2012). As the world economy climbs from recession, there clearly is a widespread call to use more diverse perspectives and a much broader-based tool kit to assess the overall health of a society (Constantinescu 2012).…”
Section: Measuring Complex Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These instruments, perspectives and/or procedures are often considered to be under the rubric of QOL (see Sirgy 2011 for a summary of QOL indicators and their applications). Governments from almost every country now seek to apply multiple methods and tools to ascertain the efficacy of development projects (Lonska and Boronenko 2012). As the world economy climbs from recession, there clearly is a widespread call to use more diverse perspectives and a much broader-based tool kit to assess the overall health of a society (Constantinescu 2012).…”
Section: Measuring Complex Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest grouppractically a halfin the set of investigated countries (most likely also in the world) is comprised of the countries -"ecologists with poor social infrastructure". The main feature of this "worldeconomy" is a relatively low energy use per capita, although the development level of social infrastructure does not allow the countries of this "world-economy" to achieve the main aim of territory developmenthuman well- (Sen, 1983;Todaro and Smith, 2011;ulHaq, 1995;Thirlwall, 2011;Lonska and Boronenko, 2012;Lonska, 2014), as the available country's resources cannot be used at their utmost for the territory development in general, but just for the development of certain privileged layers of society due to high level of crime, corruption, favouritism, etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest grouppractically a halfin the set of investigated countries (most likely also in the world) is comprised of the countries -"ecologists with poor social infrastructure". The main feature of this "worldeconomy" is a relatively low energy use per capita, although the development level of social infrastructure does not allow the countries of this "world-economy" to achieve the main aim of territory developmenthuman well- (Sen, 1983;Todaro and Smith, 2011;ulHaq, 1995;Thirlwall, 2011;Lonska and Boronenko, 2012;Lonska, 2014), as the available country's resources cannot be used at their utmost for the territory development in general, but just for the development of certain privileged layers of society due to high level of crime, corruption, favouritism, etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%