2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of p16 expression and HPV type with survival in oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(94 reference statements)
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[12][13][14][15] Details on p16 testing can be found in Appendix 2 (available at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/suppl/doi :10.1503/cmaj.161379/-/DC1). p16 immunohistochemistry is a validated method to measure HPV status in oropharyngeal cancer.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15] Details on p16 testing can be found in Appendix 2 (available at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/suppl/doi :10.1503/cmaj.161379/-/DC1). p16 immunohistochemistry is a validated method to measure HPV status in oropharyngeal cancer.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 In brief, p16 IHC was performed using commercially available antibodies (clone JC8; Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Dallas, TX, USA) and scored for cytoplasmic and nuclear staining by a consensus of 2 blinded pathologists. Only tumor cells with moderate or high intensity were counted.…”
Section: P16mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used clinical tests are in situ hybridization to detect HPV DNA and p16 INK4a (p16) immunostaining. Overexpression of the protein p16 in HPV-transformed tumor cells is strongly correlated with the presence of oncogenic HPV and improved outcomes in HNSCC, [10][11][12] making it a useful surrogate marker for HPV-associated malignancy. In situ hybridization for HPV is highly specific for the specific genotypes tested (typically a pool of high-risk genotypes) but in studies in HNSCC, has frequently been found to lack sensitivity, resulting in unacceptable levels of false-negative results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations