Evaluation of patients with coronary artery disease was for many years relatively straightforward. Angina was recognized when chest pain appeared on exertion and this signified the presence of fixed severe narrowings of epicardial coronary arteries. ~ Standardization of exercise electrocardiographic stress testing led to its widespread clinical use for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. 2 Unfortunately, the syndrome and its assessment later proved to be more complicated. Episodes of myocardial ischaemia without chest pain were recognized and the prognostic importance of silent ischaemia was defined. 3 A form of variant angina occuring primarily at rest and caused by coronary vasospasm was identified. 4 It also became obvious that the pathophysiology of unstable angina and myocardial infarction involved plaque rupture and thrombus formation, and not only vasospasm and clearly not simple progression in the accumulation of atherosclerotic material. 5 The importance of coronary endothelial dysfunction in plaque rupture, platelet adhesion and thrombus fomation also became progressively more apparent. 6 The limitations of electrocardiographic stress testing were also identified, as described in Dr. Yang's review in this issue of the Journal. 7Anatomical and physiological assessment of patients with coronary artery disease Accompanying our better understanding of clinical presentation and pathophysiology w.as the development of many diagnostic tools. Selective coronary angiography enabled clinicians to assess the presence and extent of luminal narrowings in patients. 8 Determination of the clinical importance of coronary stenoses was possible at both ends of the spectrum, but it was eventually recognized that the haemodynamic importance of lesions of intermediate severity was not as readily defined. 9 ConFrom the Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 Belanger Street East, Montrtal, Qutbec, Canada H1T1C8. siderable interobserver variability in the interpretation of coronary angiograms represented another limitation? ~ Although the advent of quantitative coronary angiography has reduced the variability of the technique, it has not improved the ability to evaluate the physiological significance of intermediate lesions.Diagnostic methods to assess the physiological relevance of coronary narrowing were developed. Myocardial lactate production was measured during periods of increased oxygen demand, ~ but this technique requiring coronary sinus catheterization has fallen out of interest. Determination of coronary flow reserve, defined as the ratio between hyperaemic and baseline flow, then became possible. Early assessment of the absolute coronary flow reserve was performed after transient arterial occlusion and measurement of hyperemic flow with an electromagnetic flowmeter. 12 It was observed that normal coronary arteries could increase their flow fourfold during hyperaemia, whereas stenosed vessels lost that ability. However, this specific method obviously could not be used clinically.Positive-emission to...