2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.10.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of Positron Emission Tomography Standard Uptake Value and Pathologic Specimen Size in Cancer of the Head and Neck

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2][3][4] Because current treatment protocols focus primarily on improving locoregional control, further gains in survival may come from improved treatment or the prevention of distant recurrence, second primary cancer, and comorbid medical illnesses. [15][16][17][18] In this article, we demonstrated that with highly effective locoregional therapy delivered by a dedicated multidisciplinary team, head and neck cancer patients now fail mostly at distant disease sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[2][3][4] Because current treatment protocols focus primarily on improving locoregional control, further gains in survival may come from improved treatment or the prevention of distant recurrence, second primary cancer, and comorbid medical illnesses. [15][16][17][18] In this article, we demonstrated that with highly effective locoregional therapy delivered by a dedicated multidisciplinary team, head and neck cancer patients now fail mostly at distant disease sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Although the optimal approach to clinical follow-up remains controversial, there is significant interest in the application of positron emission tomography (PET)/CT to overcome the limitations of physical examination or conventional imaging alone. [3][4][5] On the basis of previously published data suggesting that 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET offers a more accurate assessment of therapy response and earlier detection of recurrent disease than conventional imaging, our group instituted a protocol incorporating PET/CT in the follow-up of patients with head and neck cancers in July, 2005. [6][7][8][9][10][11] The goals of this study were 1) to establish the diagnostic accuracy of follow-up PET/CT in the detection of locoregional recurrence, distant metastases, and second primary tumors; and 2) to determine the impact of PET/CT on the prognosis and management of suspected disease recurrence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is commonly used (13)(14)(15)(16)(17) but is influenced by the display windowing and is dependent on operators. Therefore, several objective methods for contouring PET images have been Katoh 14 developed, including isocontouring based on a fixed threshold of a standardized uptake value (1,(17)(18)(19)(20), a fixed threshold of 40% to 50% of the maximum activity (3,17,(20)(21)(22), and a threshold adapted to the signal-to-background ratios (2,12,17). However, the appropriate standardized technique for the segmentation of PET images is still under investigation in the head and neck region (4)(5)(6)(23)(24)(25)(26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,31,[72][73][74]76,80 However, few groups have validated delineation process using different imaging modalities against surgical resection specimens. 31,[81][82][83][84][85] In general, all imaging modalities overestimated the tumour extension compared with surgical specimen. Nevertheless, none of the image modalities (CT, MRI or PET) completely encompassed the surgical specimen volume because of an underestimation of superficial tumour extension in the mucosa, 31 as also reported by Ng et al 81 According to Daisne et al, 31 the GTV delineated from 18 F-FDG-PET applying an adaptive signal-to-background method was significantly smaller than GTV delineated by CT or MRI.…”
Section: Radiotherapy Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%