2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of QT Interval Correction Methods During Atrial Fibrillation and Sinus Rhythm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
25
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Such approach could substantially improve detection of QT prolongation in AF, although its clinical utility remains to be determined. Consistent with the paper by Musat et al [23], our data suggests that the QTc values obtained from Bazett formula in AF are too long (in addition to the undesirable HR dependence). Its use in AF may result in incorrect clinical decisions such as unnecessary cessation of treatment with dofetilide or sotalol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such approach could substantially improve detection of QT prolongation in AF, although its clinical utility remains to be determined. Consistent with the paper by Musat et al [23], our data suggests that the QTc values obtained from Bazett formula in AF are too long (in addition to the undesirable HR dependence). Its use in AF may result in incorrect clinical decisions such as unnecessary cessation of treatment with dofetilide or sotalol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Repolarization delay predisposes patients to TdP and the short-long-short sequences that classically trigger TdP may be more common in AF than in SR. Many patients are treated for AF with class III antiarrhythmic drugs; these agents are often initiated while patients are in AF and reliable detection of excessive QT prolongation is necessary to minimize proarrhythmia [18,23]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the Bazett formula has been reported to over-correct the QT interval at faster heart rates and under-correct at slower rates (12, 15, 18, 2729). Conversely, the Fridericia formula has been shown to do the opposite -- under-correct at faster and over-correct at slower rates (12,13,15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10, 11 Considering that multiple ablations might be required, and that there is potential risk carried with each A QTc Predicts Recurrence After AF Ablation in HCM measured from 3 consecutive cardiac cycles and then a mean value was used for analysis. 25 Two investigators (S.-N.W. and N.L.)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%