“…The DAD sampling concept in the VA-AHT model was initially proposed to explain the change in the T dependence of KIEs for general H-tunneling reactions from enzymes to mutants. ,,, It was subsequently argued that the model may not be used for the adiabatic proton or hydride-transfer reactions in which tunneling may take place from the ground state of the reactant to the excited state of the product at the TRS. − The fact, however, is that the hydride-transfer reactions (as well as proton-transfer reactions , ) in enzymes versus mutants frequently demonstrate the same trend of the change in Δ E a ’s as predicted from the VA-AHT model. Several groups did find that Δ E a ’s for the hydride-transfer reactions are correlated to the DAD distributions at the TRS in the same way as described in the model. ,− , In the meantime, γ-secondary (2°) KIEs for hydride-transfer reactions in enzymes and solution were found to be fitted to this ground state tunneling model, as well. − While the commonly accepted tunneling model for hydride-transfer reactions has not been established, these studies indicate that an assumed model somehow contains a DAD−Δ E a relationship. On the other hand, simulations using the ensemble averaged variational TS theory, including multidimensional H tunneling and the empirical valence bond approach, show that the small Δ E a observed in the hydride-tunneling process catalyzed by a dihydrofolate dehydrogenase results from the insensitivity of DADs to temperature. , Nonetheless, study of the said relationship in hydride-transfer reactions will help in the development of hydride-tunneling models and provide insight into the proposed DAD sampling activation in enzyme-catalyzed hydride-transfer reactions.…”