2015
DOI: 10.4172/2155-9570.1000504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of Tono-Pen and Pneumatonometer Measurements from Four Scleral Quadrants with Intraocular Pressure Measurements from the Cornea

Abstract: Objective: To assess whether Tono-Pen and pneumatonometer measurements obtained from the sclera correlate to intraocular pressure measurements obtained from the cornea.Methods: This is a prospective, cross-sectional study, conducted at the New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai. Patients were randomized to have their left or right eye included in the study. Exclusion criteria included prior intraocular surgery (except uncomplicated cataract extraction), uveitis, corneal or scleral thinning, central corn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This variability and inconsistencies in reported studies have resulted in a confused professional literature. The variability has been explained by differences in research study designs, [3] research methods applied, [4] statistical approaches used to analyze IOP measurements, [5,6] eye biomechanics, [7,8] diurnal variations of IOP, [9] body positions in which measurements were taken (sitting or supine), [10,11] age of subjects, [12–14] ethnicity of subjects, [15] central corneal thickness (CCT), [7,16–21,29] cornea shape, [22] level of training and skill of eye care professional making the measurements (ophthalmologist, technician), [23,24] subjectivity of GAT measurements, [25,26] and fundamental principles of physics underlying the differences in how IOP are measured by the TP or GAT procedure. [7,22,27,28,30]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variability and inconsistencies in reported studies have resulted in a confused professional literature. The variability has been explained by differences in research study designs, [3] research methods applied, [4] statistical approaches used to analyze IOP measurements, [5,6] eye biomechanics, [7,8] diurnal variations of IOP, [9] body positions in which measurements were taken (sitting or supine), [10,11] age of subjects, [12–14] ethnicity of subjects, [15] central corneal thickness (CCT), [7,16–21,29] cornea shape, [22] level of training and skill of eye care professional making the measurements (ophthalmologist, technician), [23,24] subjectivity of GAT measurements, [25,26] and fundamental principles of physics underlying the differences in how IOP are measured by the TP or GAT procedure. [7,22,27,28,30]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%