2008
DOI: 10.1080/02841860801971413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of ultrasound findings with histology, tumor grade, and biological markers in breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
75
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
9
75
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are consistent with prior studies (Kim et al, 2008;Ko et al, 2010) , which reported that expression of the HER2 oncogene strongly correlated with presence of calcification on ultrasound or mammography that may be related to prognosis. In addition, we found that the ultrasound findings among HER2 positive cancers were most commonly a mass without echogenic halo, which is defined as one of back scattering in US.…”
Section: 8057 Ultrasound Utility For Predicting the Biological Behavsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results are consistent with prior studies (Kim et al, 2008;Ko et al, 2010) , which reported that expression of the HER2 oncogene strongly correlated with presence of calcification on ultrasound or mammography that may be related to prognosis. In addition, we found that the ultrasound findings among HER2 positive cancers were most commonly a mass without echogenic halo, which is defined as one of back scattering in US.…”
Section: 8057 Ultrasound Utility For Predicting the Biological Behavsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Some studies also have discussed the features of triple-negative breast cancers (negativity of ER, PR, and HER2) (Dogan et al, 2010;Ko et al, 2010;Dogan et al, 2012;Krizmanich et al, 2012;Wojcinski et al, 2012;Li et al, 2014). However, correlations between ER, PR, HER2 and ultrasound findings in previous studies were varied and none had calculated the logistic regression model for reliable identification of molecular status (Kim et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2008;Au et al, 2009;Dogan et al, 2010;Ko et al, 2010a;2010b;Dogan et al, 2012;Krizmanich et al, 2012;Wojcinski et al, 2012;Irshad et al, 2013). The aim of this retrospective study was thus to 1)evaluating the correlation of images findings with the corresponding molecular features, 2)characterizing the various ultrasound features in breast cancer by using logistic regression models, in order to identify the factors that might help in predicting the status of molecular.…”
Section: Ultrasound Utility For Predicting Biological Behavior Of Invmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies have previously correlated ultrasound features with the traditional prognostic markers, including histological tumour type [12][13][14][15][16], grade [16,17] and BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations [18,19] as well as molec- Data are presented as number of occurrences (percentages in parentheses). Significant findings in bold *p=0.01; **p=0.05; ***p=0.04; ****p=0.007 ular markers (oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2/neu) [16]. This study is to our knowledge the first to correlate ultrasound features of breast cancer with the new molecular classification groups [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several studies assessing the correlations between various imaging findings for breast cancer diagnosis, including mammography, US, and magnetic resonance imaging, along with the clinical features and immunohistopathological markers (11)(12)(13). In this study, we focused on investigating the immuohistochemical characteristics of upgraded malignancy from highrisk and borderline lesions and to correlate the upgrade rates with clinical findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%