1986
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2364(86)90226-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of zero-field splittings and site distortions. X. Complexes of Mn2+ with mixed ligands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Mn( o -phenanthroline) 2 X 2 complexes have smaller D values than the picoline series. The lower values are most likely due to the cis arrangement of their halide ions vs the trans arrangement of the picoline series, and not the ligand field strength of phenanthroline as was suggested in our earlier report . A range of η values from 0.04 (dichloro) to 0.25 (diiodo) was found for the phenanthroline series; however, high values of η were determined for all three dihalo compounds in an earlier study at low magnetic fields …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…The Mn( o -phenanthroline) 2 X 2 complexes have smaller D values than the picoline series. The lower values are most likely due to the cis arrangement of their halide ions vs the trans arrangement of the picoline series, and not the ligand field strength of phenanthroline as was suggested in our earlier report . A range of η values from 0.04 (dichloro) to 0.25 (diiodo) was found for the phenanthroline series; however, high values of η were determined for all three dihalo compounds in an earlier study at low magnetic fields …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Moreover, the E / D ratio remained largely constant in this temperature region, indicating that the overall symmetry of the ligand field was not temperature dependent. It has long been known that the zero-field interactions of Mn(II) ions in inorganic solids are pressure and temperature dependent due to their sensitivity to the metal−ligand distances. For this reason, the simplest explanation for the changes that were observed at low temperatures (<200 K) was the thermal expansion of the protein. If this expansion is linear in temperature, then the changes in Figure correspond to a −2.5 power dependence of D on the Mn(II)−ligand distances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also for the Mn(II) center of superoxide dismutase a simple Gaussian distribution was not sufficient . We interpret the distribution in D and E in terms of a structural variation, i.e., a slight variation of the bond distances and/or bond angles around the manganese, because it is known that subtle structural differences cause significant and detectable changes of the ZFS parameters . These structural differences are visible only in EPR; X-ray studies showed no structural polymorphism .…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…29 We interpret the distribution in D and E in terms of a structural variation, i.e., a slight variation of the bond distances and/or bond angles around the manganese, because it is known that subtle structural differences cause significant and detectable changes of the ZFS parameters. 30 These structural differences are visible only in EPR; X-ray studies showed no structural polymorphism. 17 The obtained distribution is broad with D-values between −12 and −8 GHz and a subensemble with a narrow distribution around −9.7 GHz.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%