2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12070-013-0665-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation Study Between Nasal Septal Deviation and Rhinosinusitis

Abstract: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a major cause of concern worldwide. Nasal septal deviation (NSD) may either cause osteomeatal obstruction or may interfere with proper airflow and potentially predispose to sinusitis. Due to the lack of a universally accepted classification on NSD it has not been established whether NSD influences the development of sinusitis or not. Mladina in 1987 proposed a classification in which he classified NSD into seven different categories. The aims and objectives of this study are to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They concluded that sinonasal anatomical variation did not increase the possibility of developing CRS and/or increase the severity of preexisting CRS. Prasad et al 478 similarly found no significant relationship between NSD and CRS.…”
Section: S63mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…They concluded that sinonasal anatomical variation did not increase the possibility of developing CRS and/or increase the severity of preexisting CRS. Prasad et al 478 similarly found no significant relationship between NSD and CRS.…”
Section: S63mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Additional searches applied to all the databases produced a grand total of 952 articles, and after reviewing the titles and the abstracts a total of 907 articles were excluded. Full texts were downloaded for 45 articles [ 2 46 ]. After retrieval and reviewing the references of those articles, an additional five articles were downloaded [ 19 , 47 50 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After retrieval and reviewing the references of those articles, an additional five articles were downloaded [ 19 , 47 50 ]. Of the 50 articles reviewed in their entirety, the following are reasons for exclusion: two were letters to the editor [ 13 , 49 ], one classified nasal defects based on subunits and corrective surgeries [ 24 ], one study correlated previously described systems in their patients [ 37 ], one used a previously published classification system [ 46 ], one described trauma and surgical techniques [ 2 ], two referenced their own previously described classification system [ 21 , 28 ], one was a questions and answers article [ 17 ], two articles focused on the external nasal deformities [ 15 , 39 ], fourteen articles focused on operative techniques [ 4 , 18 20 , 29 32 , 35 , 36 , 38 , 40 , 47 , 50 ], and ten articles failed to meet criteria as classification systems [ 5 , 7 , 9 – 12 , 14 , 22 , 34 , 42 ]. A total of fifteen articles met inclusion criteria for describing internal nasal septal deviation classification systems [ 3 , 6 , 8 , 16 , 23 , 25 – 27 , 33 , 41 , 43 , 44 , 48 , 51 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…deviated nasal septum, enlarged turbinates and nasal valve collapse) or by inflammatory mucosal disease (rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps) (Lee et al 2013;Prasad et al 2013). Correction of nasal obstruction is unquestionably a priority in the management of OSA patients, regardless of whether it leads to an improvement in OSA severity based on objective polysomnography respiratory parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%