2019
DOI: 10.1108/lht-03-2018-0042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlational analysis of topic specificity and citations count of publication venues

Abstract: Purpose Citation analysis is an important measure for the assessment of quality and impact of academic entities (authors, papers and publication venues) used for ranking of research articles, authors and publication venues. It is a common observation that high-level publication venues, with few exceptions (Nature, Science and PLOS ONE), are usually topic specific. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the claim correlation analysis between topic specificity and citation count of different types of public… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They proposed a standardized method for eliminating the differences, named PCSI (paper citation standardized index). Several studies have shown significant differences in the citations with different research topics (Daud et al, 2019;Park and Kim, 2021). In this paper, we utilize the work of Wu et al (2020) mentioned above, and the discipline is replaced with the research topic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They proposed a standardized method for eliminating the differences, named PCSI (paper citation standardized index). Several studies have shown significant differences in the citations with different research topics (Daud et al, 2019;Park and Kim, 2021). In this paper, we utilize the work of Wu et al (2020) mentioned above, and the discipline is replaced with the research topic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Academic social networks have been studied widely for the sake of knowledge about the performance of academicians. Many problems have been addressed in these networks including topic modeling [90], name ambiguity [87], structural similarities in academic social networks [9], ranking [91][92][93][94], evaluation [95,96] and prediction [97,98]. The problem of anomaly detection in these social networks has been studied broadly employing the technical point of view.…”
Section: Group Anomalies In Academic Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above analysis reveals that citation-based methods are commonly used, but depend on the coverage of databases. Hence, citation-based methods are becoming inadequate for Web 2.0, with researchers seeking more online information to assess book impacts, such as libcitation counts (White et al, 2009), library loans statistics (Cabezas-Clavijo et al, 2013) and topic specificity (Daud et al, 2019). However, these metrics are numerical metrics, without considering the relevant content information of books.…”
Section: Book Impact Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%