Correlational patterns of species diversity, swimming ability and ecological tolerance of non-marine ostracoda (Crustacea) with different reproductive modes in shallow water bodies of ağrı region (Turkey)

Külköylüoğlu, Okan; Yavuzatmaca, Mehmet; Akdemi̇r, Derya; Yılmaz, Ozan; Çelen, Ebru; Dere, Şükran; Dalkıran, Nurhayat

doi:10.1080/02705060.2019.1576551

Cited by 10 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Shannon diversity values of lakes (H′ = 2.156) and streams (H′ = 1.621) herein did not indicate conformity with the results of studies done in Kahramanmaraş (H′ = 1.79 for lakes; H′ = 2.08 for streams) (Külköylüoğlu et al 2012a), Burdur (H′ = 1.32 for lakes, H′ = 1.71 for creeks) (Yavuzatmaca et al 2017b) and Ağrı (H′ = 2.079 for lakes; H′ = 3.178 for streams) (Külköylüoğlu et al 2019) provinces of Turkey. Along with the above-mentioned studies, some other studies showed high species number per habitats for lakes than streams (lotic) regardless of numbers of sampled sites.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 64%

“…The ratio of species with reduced to well-developed swimming setae (15:12) depicted similar conclusion with the finding of Akdemir et al (2016) who reported the ratio as 16:13. In contrast, Külköylüoğlu et al (2019) and Scharf and Viehberg (2014) found ratios as 15:20 in Ağrı province (Turkey) and 9:12 in Bremen (Germany), respectively. These results may point out that ratio of non-swimmer to swimmer can change from region to region.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 88%

“…These results may point out that ratio of non-swimmer to swimmer can change from region to region. The success of benthonic (or crawling) in lotic and nektonic ostracod species in lentic habitats were proposed by Mezquita et al (2001), Akdemir et al (2016) and Külköylüoğlu et al (2019). This statement was explained by Akdemir et al (2016) in detail.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Along with the above-mentioned studies, some other studies showed high species number per habitats for lakes than streams (lotic) regardless of numbers of sampled sites. Accordingly, the number of species per lake and streams are 2.7 (n = 3) and 1 (n = 24) (Külköylüoğlu et al 2019), 1.83 (n = 6) and 1.5 (n = 8) (Külköylüoğlu et al 2012a), 1 (n = 4) and 0.46 (n = 26) (Külköylüoğlu et al 2017a), and 1.13 (n = 15) and 0.57 (n = 30) (the present study), respectively. However, Van der Meeren et al ( 2010) reported 3.8 species per stream and 3.0 species per lake in western Mongolia.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Species assemblages of Ostracoda (Crustacea) from west-site of Turkey: their indicator potential for lotic and lentic habitats

Yavuzatmaca

2020

Biologia

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To describe the indicator potential of non-marine ostracods for lotic (streams) and lentic (lakes) habitats, 42 taxa (27 recent, 15 subfossil) were evaluated from 62 sampling sites in West-site of Turkey during May of 2018. Nannocandona faba is a new report for Turkey. A higher Shannon diversity value was reported for lakes (H′ = 2.16) than streams (H′ = 1.62) when they had equal number of species (17 spp.). SIMPER analysis showed 53.01% contribution of Psychrodromus olivaceus, Candona neglecta, Heterocypris incongruens and Stenocypria fischeri with a 96.72% difference between lakes and streams. Both TWINSPAN and Indicator Species Analysis revealed that P. olivaceus (p < 0.01) and S. ficheri (p < 0.05) were found to be candidate indicators for the lotic and lentic habitats, respectively. The first two axes of CCA explained 66.90% of the relationship between species and environmental variables when elevation, dissolved oxygen concentration and water temperature showed influential effects (p < 0.05) on the ordination of species. Species with reduced swimming setae (17 spp.) were ordinated relatively closer to the center of CCA. Results showed that ecological tolerances of species seemed to be more deterministic than morphological characters (e.g., swimming setae) on their habitat preferences. A broad knowledge of the morphological and ecological preferences of the species is needed to distinguish whether habitat is chosen by species due to its ecological needs or morphological characteristics. Studies providing information about the current ecological preferences of the species give the opportunity to understand the habitat of these species.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 64%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 88%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Species assemblages of Ostracoda (Crustacea) from west-site of Turkey: their indicator potential for lotic and lentic habitats

Yavuzatmaca

2020

Biologia

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hıgutı et al (2007) declared the association of freely swimming ostracods with littoral (non-floating) macrophyte beds of lakes in the Paraná River floodplain (Brazil) and then Akdemİr et al (2016) stated the preferences of non-swimming ostracod species for lotic rather than lentic systems. Külköylüoğlu et al (2019a) reported that benthonic ostracods might prefer unstable aquatic bodies (lotic) rather than stable aquatic bodies (lentic) when compared with nektonic species. From the information mentioned above, one can interpret that both systems (lotic and lentic) can be an essential factor in ostracod species' occurrence.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Ostracoda (Crustacea) species composition between lakes and streams at high elevations in Turkey

Yavuzatmaca

2021

Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ostracods are one of the most suitable organisms because of their ecological and morphological preferences for habitat types to study the diversity between streams and lakes. Here, 24 streams and 16 lakes were sampled in 2019 to evaluate the species compositions between streams and lakes. Environmental heterogeneity in the sense of the physico-chemical variables was found among the habitats. 24 of the 29 species with 923 individuals were found in the lakes when 13 species with 898 individuals were found in the streams. Eight species were common in both habitat types. Species contributing about 70.81% to the significant differences in the species composition between the habitats showed cosmopolitan characteristics. Species variation among the replicates of lakes were higher than streams. Results indicated that the species composition was probably associated to dissolved oxygen in lakes, while electrical conductivity in streams. Relationship amid elevational range and ostracod species richness was negative in lakes when there was no clear relationship in the streams. Overall, results suggested that determination of influential regional factors in different aquatic bodies can provide important contributions to the estimation of which habitat types can be chosen by species, and the using of species as bioindicators.

show abstract

Non-marine Ostracoda (Crustacea) as indicator species group of habitat types

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Correlational patterns of species diversity, swimming ability and ecological tolerance of non-marine ostracoda (Crustacea) with different reproductive modes in shallow water bodies of ağrı region (Turkey)

Cited by 10 publications

References 48 publications

Species assemblages of Ostracoda (Crustacea) from west-site of Turkey: their indicator potential for lotic and lentic habitats

Species assemblages of Ostracoda (Crustacea) from west-site of Turkey: their indicator potential for lotic and lentic habitats

Comparison of Ostracoda (Crustacea) species composition between lakes and streams at high elevations in Turkey

Non-marine Ostracoda (Crustacea) as indicator species group of habitat types

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About