Correlations among algometry, the visual analogue scale, and the numeric rating scale to assess chronic pelvic pain in women

Abstract

Objective To investigate the correlation between the numerical rating scale, visual analogue scale, and pressure threshold by algometry in women with chronic pelvic pain. Study design This was a cross-sectional study. We included 47 patients with chronic pelvic pain. All subjects underwent a pain assessment that used three different methods and were divided according to the cause of pain (endometriosis versus non-endometriosis). Moreover, we assessed the agreement between the scales (visual, analogue and algometry) using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results The ICC for the numeric rating scale and the visual analogue scale regarding pain (0.992), dysmenorrhea (1.00) and dyspareunia (0.996) were strong. The agreement between the scales was excellent ( p ≤0.01). The correlation between algometry and the scales showed a moderate and inverse association, and this correlation was statistically significant: as the scores on the numeric rating scale and the visual analogue scale regarding dyspareunia increased, the algometry thresholds decreased. Conclusions The assessment of women with chronic pelvic pain should combine pressure algometry and the numeric rating scale or the visual analogue scale, because of their inverse correlations and satisfactory reliability and sensitivity, to make pain assessment less subjective and more accurate.

Core and Whole Body Vibration Exercise Influences Muscle Sensitivity and Posture during a Military Foot March

“…However, contrary to the VAS results there was no difference in pain pressure threshold one or two days following the foot march. The VAS and algometry have previously been shown to be correlated [43], however we found no significant correlation between the two measurements. These two measurements assess a different component of back pain, and the VAS may be a better assessment of LBP at low levels.…”

Immediate Effects of a Telerehabilitation Program Based on Aerobic Exercise in Women with Fibromyalgia

“…The main outcome measure was pain intensity. Pain intensity was registered using the 10-cm VAS, in which 0 represented “no pain” and 10 represented “the most intense pain imaginable.” This scale showed excellent reliability in chronic pain subjects, with an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of 0.97–0.99 [ 31 , 32 ].…”

Assessing Preoperative Pain Sensitivity Predicts the Postoperative Analgesic Requirement and Recovery after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study of 178 Patients

“…The visual analog scale score is a time-proven subjective means of quantifying the pain of a patient [33,34] and has been shown to correlate with algometer findings in earlier studies [34][35][36]. This prospective study has shown that by knowing the pain threshold of an individual preoperatively, we can titrate the analgesic requirement for the patient postoperatively to enhance pain relief.…”