2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03757.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations and agreement between delta‐9‐tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in blood plasma and timeline follow‐back (TLFB)‐assisted self‐reported use of cannabis of patients with cannabis use disorder and psychotic illness attending the CapOpus randomized clinical trial

Abstract: Timeline follow-back (TLFB)-assisted self-report of cannabis use correlates highly with plasma-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in patients with comorbid cannabis use disorder and psychosis. Sensitivity and specificity of timeline follow-back appear to be optimized with 19 days as the cut-off point. As such, timeline follow-back may be superior to analysis of blood when going beyond 19 days of recall.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
41
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the significant cognitive impairments in the sample being studied, a research assistant blind to treatment assignment facilitated the completion of all Timeline Follow-Back surveys using an interview-style approach to help patients adhere to the format, review their previous month of substance use, and answer any questions. The Timeline Follow-Back method has been shown to produce highly accurate estimates of substance use comparable to biological assays (Hjorthøj, Hjorthøj, & Nordentoft, 2012), and has shown adequate reliability and validity in patients with schizophrenia (Hjorthøj, Fohlmann, Larsen, Arendt, & Nordentoft, 2012). In addition, addiction severity was quantified using interviewer severity ratings (0 = least severe, 9 = most severe), for alcohol and drugs separately, based on the Addiction Severity Index (McLellan, Luborsky, Woody, O'Brien, 1980).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the significant cognitive impairments in the sample being studied, a research assistant blind to treatment assignment facilitated the completion of all Timeline Follow-Back surveys using an interview-style approach to help patients adhere to the format, review their previous month of substance use, and answer any questions. The Timeline Follow-Back method has been shown to produce highly accurate estimates of substance use comparable to biological assays (Hjorthøj, Hjorthøj, & Nordentoft, 2012), and has shown adequate reliability and validity in patients with schizophrenia (Hjorthøj, Fohlmann, Larsen, Arendt, & Nordentoft, 2012). In addition, addiction severity was quantified using interviewer severity ratings (0 = least severe, 9 = most severe), for alcohol and drugs separately, based on the Addiction Severity Index (McLellan, Luborsky, Woody, O'Brien, 1980).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social adjustment was assessed using the Social Adjustment Scale-II (Schooler, Weissman, & Hogarty, 1979), Major Role Adjustment Inventory (Hogarty et al, 1974), and the Global Assessment Scale (Endicott, Spitzer, Fleiss, & Cohen, 1976) Symptomatology was assessed using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (Overall & Gorham, 1962), Wing Negative Symptom Scale (Wing, 1961), Raskin Depression Scale (Raskin, Schulterbrandt, Reatig, & McKeon, 1969), and Covi Anxiety Scale (Lipman, 1982). Finally, previous 30-day substance use was assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back interview (Sobell & Sobell, 1992), which has been shown to be a reliable and valid measure of substance use in psychosis (Hjorthøj, Fohlmann, Larsen, Arendt, & Nordentoft, 2012). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other evidence has suggested that asking psychotic patients about their use of cannabis is, at least in some situations, more accurate than urine or blood testing. 36 Finally, our sample is representative of subjects accessing the adult psychiatric services who, therefore, experience their AOP between age 18 and 65 years. Thus, we are excluding those who have their illness onset in the early teens, a time when many adolescents are likely to first try cannabis.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%