1992
DOI: 10.1097/00002826-199201001-00205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations Between Abnormal Hippocampal Morphology and Prefrontal Physiology in Schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In SPD, illusions and magical thinking impairment correlated with the right fusiform gyrus volumes (Dickey et al, 2003a); odd speech with left superior temporal gyrus volumes in females (Dickey et al, 2003b); and in non-psychiatric subjects a fMRI experiment designed to simulate low level paranoia/delusions, selectively activated the left inferior frontal gyrus (Brodmann area 44) (Blackwood et al, 2000), a region shown to have metabolic rates in SPD subjects intermediate between control and schizophrenic subjects (Buchsbaum et al, 2002). Although tentative, these findings, taken together, suggest that at least some of the dominate symptoms of SPD may be attributable to abnormalities in the frontotemporal cortices, again, not unlike what has been shown in schizophrenia Weinberger et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In SPD, illusions and magical thinking impairment correlated with the right fusiform gyrus volumes (Dickey et al, 2003a); odd speech with left superior temporal gyrus volumes in females (Dickey et al, 2003b); and in non-psychiatric subjects a fMRI experiment designed to simulate low level paranoia/delusions, selectively activated the left inferior frontal gyrus (Brodmann area 44) (Blackwood et al, 2000), a region shown to have metabolic rates in SPD subjects intermediate between control and schizophrenic subjects (Buchsbaum et al, 2002). Although tentative, these findings, taken together, suggest that at least some of the dominate symptoms of SPD may be attributable to abnormalities in the frontotemporal cortices, again, not unlike what has been shown in schizophrenia Weinberger et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The neuroanatomical relationships of the PFC and its subregions are characterized by its numerous connections with the amygdala, the temporal cortex, the parietal cortex, thalamic nuclei, hippocampus, dorsal and ventral striatum, hypothalamus, and midbrain, as well as with one another (e.g., Carmichael & Price, 1995;Ghashghaei & Barbas, 2002;Goldman-Rakic, 1987;Heidbreder & Groenewegen, 2003;Middleton & Strick, 1996a, 1996bRoberts et al, 2007;Vertes, 2004). Increasingly, the contribution of these structures to executive function, such as working memory (e.g., hippocampus, Weinberger, Berman, & Torrey, 1992;Weinberger, Zigun, Bartley, Jones, & Torrey, 1992), attention (e.g., subthalamic nucleus, Baunez & Robbins, 1997;Chudasama, Baunez, & Robbins, 2003) and decision-making (e.g., amygdala, Baxter et al, 2000), has been demonstrated. In this article, I have not attempted to review the complex functional interplay between the PFC and the many cortical and subcortical structures to which it is connected, as these details are presently poorly understood and is the topic of intense investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As many early studies were unable to distinguish between the hippocampus and the amygdala because of technical limitations, studies that measured the 2 structures together were not excluded. Four studies were excludedbecauseofsubjectduplication, 35,45,59,60 3becausemeans and SDs were not reported, 50,61,62 6 because the hippocampal area was measured instead of the volume, 49,53,[63][64][65][66] 1 because control subjects were not included, 67 1 because the parahippocampal gyrus was included in the ROI, 68 and 1 because it evaluated elderly patients (mean age, 78.1 years). 69 Therefore, 18 studies were ultimately included in this meta-analytic study, including data from our laboratory.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%