1994
DOI: 10.1016/1352-2310(94)90251-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations between gravimetry and light scattering photometry for atmospheric aerosols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Published research results (reviewed below) based on nephelometric measurements in rural field settings are inconsistent with regard to data quality (i.e., nominal (factory-calibrated) readings vs data scaled to fit gravitational field samples, particle size fraction of gravimetric calibration) and treatment of temporal resolution (Brauer, 1995(Brauer, , 1996Ezzati et al, 2000a, b;Balakrishnan et al, 2004). Several studies have observed humidity-dependence of light scattering signals in ambient environments (e.g., Thomas and Gebhart, 1994;Richards et al, 1999;Day et al, 2000;Day and Malm, 2001). However, previously published field research using nephelometers in solid fuel-using rural households does not explicitly contend with high relative humidity excursions.…”
Section: Scope Of This Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published research results (reviewed below) based on nephelometric measurements in rural field settings are inconsistent with regard to data quality (i.e., nominal (factory-calibrated) readings vs data scaled to fit gravitational field samples, particle size fraction of gravimetric calibration) and treatment of temporal resolution (Brauer, 1995(Brauer, , 1996Ezzati et al, 2000a, b;Balakrishnan et al, 2004). Several studies have observed humidity-dependence of light scattering signals in ambient environments (e.g., Thomas and Gebhart, 1994;Richards et al, 1999;Day et al, 2000;Day and Malm, 2001). However, previously published field research using nephelometers in solid fuel-using rural households does not explicitly contend with high relative humidity excursions.…”
Section: Scope Of This Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nephelometers measure the particle light scattering extinction coefficient ( sp ) that can be related to particle mass concentration. Previous studies comparing nephelometer results to PM 2.5 impactor measurements indicate strong correlations ( 0.81< R 2 <0.96 ) when sampling kitchens fuelled with biomass in Mexico, in homes with wood stoves and ETS in rural British Columbia (Brauer, 1995;Brauer et al, 1996 ) and in ambient air (Waggoner and Weiss, 1980;Koenig et al, 1993;Thomas and Gebhart, 1994 ). In the present study, the performance of a nephelometer (Radiance Research Model M903, Seattle, WA ) for a large number of cooking and ETS sources was compared with mass concentrations determined using two different particulate mass concentration measurement techniques: a PM 2.5 Harvard Impactor (Marple et al, 1987 ) and a piezobalance (TSI Model 8510, St. Paul, MN ) equipped with a PM 3.5 impactor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This temperature increment reduced the RH to below 50%, as estimated from a standard psychrometric chart (MIE, 1994); and (4) AH with a humidistat that switches on and off the electricity based on a pre-set RH level (AHH): This mode is the same as the AH mode except that the heater was set to be activated only when the ambient RH was over 85%. Although several studies (e.g., Thomas and Gebhart, 1994;Sioutas et al, 2000) observed the RH effect starting at 60%, our previous field tests (Quintana et al, 2000) showed that the RH effect on the pDR in the AUH mode was moderate between 60% and 85% and prominent above 85%. This, in conjunction with the concern of losing particle-bound semivolatile compounds due to heating the incoming air all the time (Bergin et al, 1997), prompted us to set the humidistat at 85%.…”
Section: Field Study Design and Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such devices need to be calibrated against gravimetric devices in the field, rather than relying on the calibration curve developed by the manufacturer with standard test dust. In addition, light-scattering is affected by relative humidity (RH) (McMurry and Stolzenburg, 1989;Thomas and Gebhart, 1994;Brauer, 1995;Day et al, 2000;Quintana et al, 2000;Day and Malm, 2001). Previous papers showed that the RH effect may be corrected by either physical (Sloane, 1984;Sloane and Wolff, 1985;Lowenthal et al, 1995;Sioutas et al, 2000) or statistical models (Richards et al, 1999), or prevented by using a heater (Liu et al, 2002) or a diffusion drier (Sioutas et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%