2016
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.17357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations Between Ratings on the Resident Annual Evaluation Summary and the Internal Medicine Milestones and Association With ABIM Certification Examination Scores Among US Internal Medicine Residents, 2013-2014

Abstract: IMPORTANCE US internal medicine residency programs are now required to rate residents using milestones. Evidence of validity of milestone ratings is needed.OBJECTIVE To compare ratings of internal medicine residents using the pre-2015 resident annual evaluation summary (RAES), a nondevelopmental rating scale, with developmental milestone ratings. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSCross-sectional study of US internal medicine residency programs in the 2013-2014 academic year, including 21 284 internal medicine r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, in a study assessing internal medicine residency milestones over a 3-year period, the authors noted an increase from 2.46 to 3.92 over a 36-month period of training across all milestones. 20 A similar trend was reported in national Internal Medicine Milestone ratings, 9 which showed an increase up to 0.77 for each PGY level, highlighting a much greater change per PGY than within our cohort of fellows. While recent data from the ACGME show upward trends of milestone ratings in subspecialty training programs nationwide, 17 this does not account for myriad institutional factors that affect milestone ratings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, in a study assessing internal medicine residency milestones over a 3-year period, the authors noted an increase from 2.46 to 3.92 over a 36-month period of training across all milestones. 20 A similar trend was reported in national Internal Medicine Milestone ratings, 9 which showed an increase up to 0.77 for each PGY level, highlighting a much greater change per PGY than within our cohort of fellows. While recent data from the ACGME show upward trends of milestone ratings in subspecialty training programs nationwide, 17 this does not account for myriad institutional factors that affect milestone ratings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Early experiences with the residency milestones provided ample validity evidence in this population. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] One study supported the construct validity of competency assessment using milestones through the demonstration of a predictable upward trend of milestone ratings over the course of residency training. 10 While recent data from the ACGME highlighted a similar upward trend in subspecialty training programs nationally, 17 it is not clear if this trend would be observed within researchoriented fellowship training programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…25 Early data on the impact of the milestones shows that they successfully measure GME outcomes. 26,27 The ACGME Clinical Learning Environment Review monitors fatigue management and wellness. 28…”
Section: Fmlamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,3,16 Early validity research studies are encouraging in supporting the use of Milestones professional development. [6][7][8][9][10] As a sufficient number of residents graduate and enter practice we will be able to examine the links, or associations, between Milestone performance and quality of practice: the ultimate outcome goal of the Milestone initiative.…”
Section: Box 1 -The Six General Competenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%