2017
DOI: 10.32007/med.1936/jfacmedbagdad.v59i3.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations between Serum Interleukins-2,-4 Levels and Some Biochemical Parameters in Iraqi Patients with Osteoporosis

Abstract: Background: Osteoporosis is a frequent disease that is manifested by reduced in mineral density and raised in fracture risk. Recent studies have indicated that osteoporosis is caused by composite connections among local and systemic regulators of bone cell function. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between interleukin-2, interleukin-4, and some biochemical markers in Iraqi patients with osteoporosis. Patients and Methods: Forty five osteoporotic patients were incorporate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results contradict these studies, the total serum Ca +2 levels for patients with KOA was considerably lower equated to the healthy group and thus underline the conclusions of Li et al, which support an inverse association between serum Ca +2 values and radiological progression of KOA (32). In contrary, Iraqi study, found a decrease in serum Ca +2 and Mg +2 levels among osteoporotic patients as compared to the controls, but it was not significant (33).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…The present results contradict these studies, the total serum Ca +2 levels for patients with KOA was considerably lower equated to the healthy group and thus underline the conclusions of Li et al, which support an inverse association between serum Ca +2 values and radiological progression of KOA (32). In contrary, Iraqi study, found a decrease in serum Ca +2 and Mg +2 levels among osteoporotic patients as compared to the controls, but it was not significant (33).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%