2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.08.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations highlighting effects of the PCB’s Copper ratio on the free convective heat transfer for a tilted QFN32 electronic package

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results complement those of Baïri (2016d), which present the distributions of the surface temperatures for assemblies equipped with the QFN16, 32, 16b and 32b models subjected to natural convection. They also complete the survey of Baïri (2016c), which clearly shows that the thermal conductivity of the upper copper layer of PCB highly affects the thermal behaviour of the electronic assemblies equipped with a QFN32 device. The survey of Baïri et al (2016) shows moreover that the moulding compound (resin) used to encapsulate the QFN64 package significantly affects its thermal behaviour during operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results complement those of Baïri (2016d), which present the distributions of the surface temperatures for assemblies equipped with the QFN16, 32, 16b and 32b models subjected to natural convection. They also complete the survey of Baïri (2016c), which clearly shows that the thermal conductivity of the upper copper layer of PCB highly affects the thermal behaviour of the electronic assemblies equipped with a QFN32 device. The survey of Baïri et al (2016) shows moreover that the moulding compound (resin) used to encapsulate the QFN64 package significantly affects its thermal behaviour during operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values have been measured within ±3% by means of the Hot Disk TPS 2500 model [24], based on the transient plane source (TPS) method [25], with parallelepipedic samples (square side 12 mm, 4 mm thick) provided by a QFN's manufacturer. The copper network density corresponds to a Copper ratio of 5.26% (see [18]). The resulting thermal conductivity of the PCB according to its plane is of 20 Wm − 1 K −1 and 0.35 in its thickness.…”
Section: The Considered Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many generated power ranges (low and high ranges) varying between 0.01 and 1.0 W are considered. For these electronic assemblies, it is clearly shown [18] that the thermal conductivity of the upper copper layer of the PCB highly affects the thermal behaviour of the electronic assemblies. The results are presented by means of specific relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conduction in the wire-bonded QFN version constitutes the main particularity examined in this survey. More details concerning the 3D numerical procedure adopted in this work can be found in the recent works by Baïri (2016bBaïri ( , 2016c. The calculations were made for many configurations obtained by varying the inclination angle a between 0°and 90°by steps of 15°and the generated power P between 0.01 and 0.1 W by steps of 0.01 W, corresponding to the partial operating conditions of the device.…”
Section: Hff 276mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cavities of various shapes are treated with many convective fluids, going from air to nanofluids (Abu-Nada, 2015;Basak and Chamkha, 2012;Basak et al, 2009;Hossain et al, 2013;Malleswaran et al, 2013;Öztop et al, 2012;Pop et al, 2003, Rashidi andShahmohamadi, 2009). Recent studies are devoted to the aerothermal phenomena and the convective heat transfer concerning assemblies equipped with 16 leads by Baïri (2015) and 32 leads by Baïri and Haddad (2016) and Baïri (2016aBaïri ( , 2016b, with and without wire-bondings. To the authors' knowledge, only the work by Baïri (2016c) quantifies the free convective heat transfer coefficient for a QFN64b generating a power varying between 0.01 and 0.1 W, but the temperature distribution on the different parts of the assembly is not presented.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%