2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations of noncarious cervical lesions and occlusal factors determined by using pressure-detecting sheet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
53
1
22

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
11
53
1
22
Order By: Relevance
“…It's consistent with previous studies [7,15]. Erosion is also a likely reason for NCCL formation [19].…”
Section: Etiology and Risk Factorssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It's consistent with previous studies [7,15]. Erosion is also a likely reason for NCCL formation [19].…”
Section: Etiology and Risk Factorssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This percentage is similar to that (74.2%) found in another study in which 159 men were examined [15]. There is some suggestion that the shape of the lesion is related to its etiology [16].…”
Section: Shape Dimensions and Treatmentsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…37 Similarly, consideration should perhaps be given to using RMGI more frequently in the restoration of NCCLs, as other studies have also shown high retention rates in comparison to other materials. 38,39 Occlusal factors are considered by many to be important in the aetiology of NCCLs [40][41][42] and in the success of restorations. 30 The use of low-modulus materials is also recommended by some to prevent detachment of adhesive restorations resulting from tooth flexure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%