2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-019-10002-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations of self-perception in reading and in writing, reading and writing performance in web-mediated and conventional writing instruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The covariance estimate of PC is higher than EoR in the Layer 2. Similarly, multiple research has found a strong relationship between reading performance and PC (Cequeña, 2020; Gunardi, 2022; Meşe Soytürk, 2020; Souvignier and Mokhlesgerami, 2006). Therefore, the current study may be seen as a continuation of previous work as well as a fresh contribution to ecological background research (Bronfenbrenner, 1979; Zumbo et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The covariance estimate of PC is higher than EoR in the Layer 2. Similarly, multiple research has found a strong relationship between reading performance and PC (Cequeña, 2020; Gunardi, 2022; Meşe Soytürk, 2020; Souvignier and Mokhlesgerami, 2006). Therefore, the current study may be seen as a continuation of previous work as well as a fresh contribution to ecological background research (Bronfenbrenner, 1979; Zumbo et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Moreover, Table 5 shows that there were three studies [49,56,57] in which ICTs were not used for activities focused on achieving these ILOs. Likewise, in four studies ICTs were employed for all learning activities [52][53][54]58] and in one they were employed in fewer than half of the activities [59]. When analyzing the different ILOs of the writing interventions, none were found to fall into this category.…”
Section: Results Analysis By Categories Of Intermediate Learning Obje...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the analysis of the types of ICT used in the interventions indicate that the most used are digital writing tools (n = 10) in which the student can only write (e.g., Word or digital notepads) and virtual classrooms (n = 9) such as Moodle or Edmodo. To a lesser extent, communicative tools were used (n = 4), such as WhatsApp or email [48,54,59,61]; digital games (n = 3) [41,42,60]; and Automated Writing Evaluation Systems or AWEs (n = 3) [45,50,55]. Finally, as shown in Table 8, the least used ICTs were ITSs, which were only used in one study.…”
Section: Results Of Types Of Ict Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%