2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlative Hyperspectral Imaging Using a Dimensionality-Reduction-Based Image Fusion Method

Abstract: Chemical imaging techniques are increasingly being used in combination to achieve a greater understanding of a sample. This is especially true in the case of mass spectrometry imaging (MSI), where the use of different ionization sources allows detection of different classes of molecules across a range of spatial resolutions. There has been significant recent effort in the development of data fusion algorithms that attempt to combine the benefits of multiple techniques, such that the output provides additional … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of this have already demonstrated integration of spatially targeted MS data with autofluorescence microscopy and multiplexed immunohistochemistry approaches such as imaging mass cytometry (IMC) and co-detection by indexing (CODEX) to molecularly characterize and discover markers for kidney FTUs and cell types (Patterson et al, 2018;Singh et al, 2019;Martín-Saiz et al, 2021;Neumann et al, 2021a,b). To enable these multimodal approaches, computational tools are emerging that automatically annotate, integrate, and mine molecular imaging data from orthogonal technologies for unbiased data interpretation and identification of candidate biomarkers (Van de Plas et al, 2015;Palmer et al, 2017;Vollnhals et al, 2017;Balluff et al, 2019;Race et al, 2020;Martín-Saiz et al, 2021;Tideman et al, 2021).…”
Section: Conclusion and Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of this have already demonstrated integration of spatially targeted MS data with autofluorescence microscopy and multiplexed immunohistochemistry approaches such as imaging mass cytometry (IMC) and co-detection by indexing (CODEX) to molecularly characterize and discover markers for kidney FTUs and cell types (Patterson et al, 2018;Singh et al, 2019;Martín-Saiz et al, 2021;Neumann et al, 2021a,b). To enable these multimodal approaches, computational tools are emerging that automatically annotate, integrate, and mine molecular imaging data from orthogonal technologies for unbiased data interpretation and identification of candidate biomarkers (Van de Plas et al, 2015;Palmer et al, 2017;Vollnhals et al, 2017;Balluff et al, 2019;Race et al, 2020;Martín-Saiz et al, 2021;Tideman et al, 2021).…”
Section: Conclusion and Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. 275 As described earlier, with MALDI-MSI the choice of matrix partially determines what analytes are ionized and detected. Due to the lack of a "one-size-fits-all" MALDI matrix, combining data from multiple MALDI MSI acquisitions has been demonstrated by many.…”
Section: Combinations Of Msi and Msimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This more advanced scenario will essentially mine spatial information from the modality and combine it with direct signal correlation (Figure ). Some image fusion approaches ,,, and approaches using cell morphology and intensity information , are examples of this approach. Image fusion itself is an important and growing topic (Figure ,1).…”
Section: Multimodal Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Van de Plas et al have focused on the fusion of matrixassisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) MSI data with optical images of H&E stainings through the mapping between two modalities based on linear regression models. 22 And recently, a novel method was introduced by Race et al 23 based on dimensionality reduction through non-negative matrix factorization. While providing good results, given the nonlinear nature of biological data, taking into account these complex relationships is preferable.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%