1988
DOI: 10.1097/00004347-198812000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlative Study of Human Papillomavirus DNA, Histopathology, and Morphometry in Cervical Condyloma and Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5 The degree of intraepithelial neoplasia (grades I to III/in situ carcinoma) was judged on the degree of atypical cellular aspects and their topography within the epithelium as for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. 6 …”
Section: Histological Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The degree of intraepithelial neoplasia (grades I to III/in situ carcinoma) was judged on the degree of atypical cellular aspects and their topography within the epithelium as for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. 6 …”
Section: Histological Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association between condyloma acuminata caused by HPV types 16, 18, 31, and 33 and the development of squamous-cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix is established now beyond doubt. 67,68 Lesions of the cervix designated currently ''low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (mild dysplasia/CIN I)'' and that show hyperchromatic nuclei in the lower third of surface epithelium but that do not show cytopathologic attributes of infection by HPV, in reality, are very superficial squamous-cell carcinomas and should be diagnosed as that. Those lesions are analogous morphologically to the solar keratotic type of very superficial squamous-cell carcinoma (solar keratosis) of the skin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adoption of this two-tier classification over the previous three-or four-tier systems was based largely on the desire to increase uniformity in reporting and to reduce the pervasive interobserver variability in cytologic diagnoses. [42][43][44] This is of particular relevance because ploidy has been a good predictor of clinical behavior in both prospective and retrospective studies; the majority of CINs that progress or persist are aneuploid, whereas the majority of those that regress are diploid or polyploid. 18 Consensus is lacking when reporting cervical cancer precursor lesions identified in histologic sections.…”
Section: Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%